Schizophrenia Research Forum - A Catalyst for Creative Thinking
Home Profile Membership/Get Newsletter Log In Contact Us
 For Patients & Families
What's New
Recent Updates
SRF Papers
Current Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Conference News
Plain English
Forums
Current Hypotheses
Idea Lab
Online Discussions
Virtual Conferences
Interviews
Resources
What We Know
SchizophreniaGene
Animal Models
Drugs in Trials
Research Tools
Grants
Jobs
Conferences
Journals
Community Calendar
General Information
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
History
SRF Team
Advisory Board
Support Us
How to Cite
Fan (E)Mail
The Schizophrenia Research Forum web site is sponsored by the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation and was created with funding from the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.
Annotation

Jablensky A. Subtyping schizophrenia: implications for genetic research. Mol Psychiatry . 2006 Sep 1 ; 11(9):815-36. PubMed Abstract

Comments on Paper and Primary News
Comment by:  Nick CraddockMichael Owen (SRF Advisor)
Submitted 19 July 2006 Posted 19 July 2006

Assen Jablensky has written a comprehensive and scholarly review of attempts to define valid subtypes of schizophrenia and their implications for genetic research. We are broadly in agreement with the points he makes and the general thrust of his argument, which is that, “The dissection of the syndrome into modular endophenotypes with specific neurocognitive or neurophysiological underpinnings is beginning to be perceived as a promising approach in schizophrenia genetics.” He has, however, misunderstood us if he believes that we (Craddock and Owen, 2005) are advocating replacing the concept of schizophrenia with the pre-Kraepelinian notion of a unitary psychosis. Rather, we believe, like he does, that, “The study of endophenotypes cutting across the conventional diagnostic boundaries may reveal unexpected patterns of associations with symptoms, personality traits, or behavior.”

It is our view that the current diagnostic frameworks are a hindrance to progress in psychiatric research (  Read more


View all comments by Nick Craddock
View all comments by Michael Owen
Submit a Comment on this Paper
Make a comment on this paper. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Affiliation  
Country or Territory  
*Login Email Address  
*Confirm Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  
Get SRF newsletter with recent commentary?  
 
Enter the code as it is shown below:
This code helps prevent automated registrations.

I recommend this paper

Please note: A member needs to be both registered and logged in to submit a comment.

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


 
 
SRF News
SRF Comments
Text Size
Reset Text Size
Email this pageEmail this page

Share/Bookmark
Copyright © 2005- 2014 Schizophrenia Research Forum Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright