Schizophrenia Research Forum - A Catalyst for Creative Thinking

News Brief—Dead End for Lilly mGluR Schizophrenia Drug

29 August 2012. Eli Lilly and Company announced in a press release today that they will stop Phase 3 clinical trials of a schizophrenia drug targeting the metabotropic glutamate receptor. This was not unexpected, as just last month Lilly had revealed further disappointing trial results of the mGluR2/3 agonist pomaglumetad methionil (also called LY2140023). At the time, researchers interviewed by SRF had mixed opinions about the way forward (see SRF news story), and a Lilly spokesperson had told SRF that they were still pressing forward with the development of LY2140023, including analyzing data on mGluR2/3 agonists as adjunctive therapy to approved schizophrenia drugs. In the latest press release, they write that this Phase 2 study also failed to meet its primary endpoint.—Hakon Heimer.

Comments on Related News


Related News: Opinions Mixed on Future for Lilly’s mGluR2/3 Agonist for Schizophrenia

Comment by:  Philip Seeman (Disclosure)
Submitted 15 August 2012
Posted 22 August 2012

The Lilly results of 11 July 2012 are not surprising, considering that the main ingredient of LY2140023 is LY404039, which is both a glutamate agonist and a weak partial dopamine agonist with only one-hundredth the potency of aripiprazole (Seeman and Guan, 2009; Seeman, 2012a), and considering that closer inspection of the clinical data (Kinon et al., 2011) showed that olanzapine was effective in schizophrenia, while LY2140023 was not (Seeman, 2012b).

References:

Kinon BJ, Zhang L, Millen BA, Osuntokun OO, Williams JE, Kollack-Walker S, Jackson K, Kryzhanovskaya L, Jarkova N, . A multicenter, inpatient, phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study of LY2140023 monohydrate in patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia. J Clin Psychopharmacol . 2011 Jun ; 31(3):349-55. Abstract

Seeman P, Guan HC. Glutamate agonist LY404,039 for treating schizophrenia has affinity for the dopamine D2(High) receptor. Synapse. 2009 Oct ; 63(10):935-9. Abstract

Seeman P. An agonist at glutamate and dopamine D2 receptors, LY404039. Neuropharmacology. 2012a Jul 4. Abstract

Seeman P. Comment on "A multicenter, inpatient, phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging study of LY2140023 monohydrate in patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia" by Kinon et al. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012b Apr ; 32(2):291-2; author reply 292-293. Abstract

View all comments by Philip Seeman

Related News: Opinions Mixed on Future for Lilly’s mGluR2/3 Agonist for Schizophrenia

Comment by:  Hugo Geerts
Submitted 15 August 2012
Posted 22 August 2012

This is indeed another setback for the schizophrenia patient community, and it underscores the difficulty of translating animal model outcomes to the clinical situation. We have to think about introducing a new technology in schizophrenia drug discovery and development that would combine the best of preclinical animal information, but transplanted into a humanized environment to reverse this string of clinical failures.

One such approach is Quantitative Systems or Network Pharmacology, a computer-based mechanistic disease model of biophysically realistic neuronal networks that combines preclinical neurophysiology with human pathology, and clinical and imaging data (the topic of a recent NIH White Paper). Such an approach can be calibrated with retrospective clinical data, and then used to predict and examine future clinical trials. Applying this quantitative paradigm to the (also much publicized) failure of Dimebon in AD, researchers found that there was a fundamental off-target effect that precluded Dimebon from having cognitive benefits. Further analyses suggested that an imbalance in a common dopaminergic phenotype could increase part of the clinical signal difference as observed in the first (successful) Phase 2 trial.

In the case of schizophrenia, we find that affecting glutamatergic (such as with the mGluR2/R3 agonist) or GABA neurotransmission almost always leads to an inverse U-shaped dose response, because of the intrinsic balance between excitation and inhibition in cortical networks. Using such an approach forces discovery scientists to look beyond the single target and think about the impact on networks and circuits that ultimately drive human behavior and pathology in CNS disorders.

Unlike the traditional, currently used "cartoon"-based qualitative drawings, this approach allows for a quantitative outcome that, in principle, can help define the optimal "sweet spot" of the dose response by looking at the outcome of endophenotypes such as BOLD fMRI.

References:

Athan Spiros, Hugo Geerts. 2012. A quantitative way to estimate clinical off-target effects for human membrane brain targets in CNS Research and Development. Exp Pharmacology, 4; 53-61.

Athan Spiros, Patrick Roberts, Hugo Geerts. (2012) A Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Computer Model for Schizophrenia Efficacy and Extrapyramidal Side Effects, Drug Dev. Res, 73(4): 1098-1109.

View all comments by Hugo Geerts

Related News: SIRS 2014—Refining Schizophrenia Clinical Drug Trials

Comment by:  Anthony Grace, SRF Advisor (Disclosure)
Submitted 4 June 2014
Posted 4 June 2014

This was an important symposium, but I am concerned about the impression that these findings suggest a problem with translating data from animal models to the clinic. In order to translate effectively, one must use an animal model that recapitulates as much of the disease state as possible, and acute pharmacological challenges are inadequate for this. Developmental models should be a more effective screen. But perhaps more important, there is a very big difference between animal models and clinical trials: In animal models, the first therapeutic drug that the animal sees is the novel target compound. In contrast, clinical trials comprise patients that have been treated for antipsychotic drugs for decades, then withdrawn for only a single week before the test compound is evaluated.

It has been known for quite some time that repeated D2 antagonists change the brain in substantial ways. In our recent paper (Gill et al., 2014), we found that a GABAA alpha 5 compound that was highly effective in reversing dopamine neuron hyper-responsivity and amphetamine hyperlocomotion in MAM model rats was completely ineffective if the MAM rats were given just three weeks of haloperidol and withdrawn from the drug for one week. Therefore, once maintained on a D2 antipsychotic drug, we posit that the system changes from a hippocampal overdriven dopamine system to a postsynaptic dopamine receptor supersensitivity psychosis, such that only another D2 antagonist can now effectively replace the drug that had been withdrawn. We need to rethink clinical trial design if we are to effectively evaluate drugs with novel targets, or we may never get away from D2 antagonist therapy.

References:

Gill KM, Cook JM, Poe MM, Grace AA. Prior antipsychotic drug treatment prevents response to novel antipsychotic agent in the methylazoxymethanol acetate model of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2014 Mar ;40(2):341-50. Abstract

View all comments by Anthony Grace

Related News: Ketamine Elicits Brain State Resembling Early Stages of Schizophrenia

Comment by:  Hugo Geerts
Submitted 26 August 2014
Posted 26 August 2014

This is a very interesting contribution to improve the understanding of the progressive nature of schizophrenia pathology. Ketamine-induced effects have been used for a long time in healthy volunteers or in animal models, both rodents and non-human primates to "mimic" schizophrenia pathology. The observation that ketamine mimics more the very early schizophrenia or the at-risk state but not the more chronic pathology helps to explain the dissociation between effects of compounds in ketamine-induced deficits and in chronic schizophrenia, for example, nicotine (D'Souza et al., 2012), glycine transport inhibitor (D'Souza et al., 2012), haloperidol (Oranje et al., 2009), and lamotrigine (Goff et al., 2007).

The impact of these findings, if reproduced in a longitudinal study, is very important. This model of ketamine-induced deficit can be used in animals to test new experimental interventions in very early psychosis or in at-risk subjects. This is a patient group that is currently underserved in terms of therapeutic interventions and for which there is great interest. For the first time, we now have a model that mimics important aspects of the early schizophrenia pathology, and the hope is that when addressing these changes with the right medication early on, one could postpone or delay the onset of overt schizophrenia pathology, which could be the beginning of a preventive strategy.

References:

D'Souza DC, Ahn K, Bhakta S, Elander J, Singh N, Nadim H, Jatlow P, Suckow RF, Pittman B, Ranganathan M. Nicotine fails to attenuate ketamine-induced cognitive deficits and negative and positive symptoms in humans: implications for schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry . 2012 Nov 1 ; 72(9):785-94. Abstract

D'Souza DC, Singh N, Elander J, Carbuto M, Pittman B, Udo De Haes J, Sjogren M, Peeters P, Ranganathan M, Schipper J. Glycine transporter inhibitor attenuates the psychotomimetic effects of ketamine in healthy males: preliminary evidence. Neuropsychopharmacology . 2012 Mar ; 37(4):1036-46. Abstract

Oranje B, Gispen-de Wied CC, Westenberg HG, Kemner C, Verbaten MN, Kahn RS. Haloperidol counteracts the ketamine-induced disruption of processing negativity, but not that of the P300 amplitude. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol . 2009 Jul ; 12(6):823-32. Abstract

Goff DC, Keefe R, Citrome L, Davy K, Krystal JH, Large C, Thompson TR, Volavka J, Webster EL. Lamotrigine as add-on therapy in schizophrenia: results of 2 placebo-controlled trials. J Clin Psychopharmacol . 2007 Dec ; 27(6):582-9. Abstract

View all comments by Hugo Geerts

Related News: Ketamine Elicits Brain State Resembling Early Stages of Schizophrenia

Comment by:  Alexandre Seillier
Submitted 9 September 2014
Posted 11 September 2014

The "Ketamine Model" Revived?
Despite the seminal review by Jentsch and Roth arguing that long-term, rather than acute administration of NMDA antagonists, such as phencyclidine (PCP) and ketamine, may more isomorphically model schizophrenia (Jentsch and Roth, 1999), acute ketamine remained one of the most widely utilized pharmacological models in both humans and rodents. Recently, Dawson and co-workers added to the accumulating body of evidence that "alterations in brain circuitry that result from chronic, but not from acute, NMDA receptor blockade most accurately reflect the systems level differences in brain network functioning seen in schizophrenia" (Dawson et al., 2014a; Dawson et al., 2014b). Indeed, using brain network connectivity, they reported that, "at a systems level, the mechanisms through which acute ketamine treatment induces schizophrenia-like symptoms may be profoundly divergent from those that contribute to these symptoms in the disorder."

This new study by Anticevic et al. (2014) might have resolved the paradox of acute ketamine-induced hyperfrontality given the hypofrontality observed in schizophrenia. As previously shown in both healthy humans and mice (Dawson et al., 2014a; Driesen et al., 2013), acute ketamine administration was associated with increased prefrontal cortex connectivity. On the other hand, whereas chronic schizophrenics had reduced prefrontal cortex functional connectivity, patients in the early stage of schizophrenia showed increased prefrontal cortex functional connectivity. As stated by the authors, "these data point to a qualitative difference between NMDAR antagonist and chronic schizophrenia effects, suggesting that ketamine's effect on prefrontal cortex connectivity may be more relevant to particular illness stages."

Longitudinal studies will be necessary to confirm that the "phase of illness is an important moderator of the prefrontal cortex functional connectivity in schizophrenia." The authors also addressed some discrepancies that need to be highlighted. First, the reduced and the increased prefrontal cortex functional connectivity in chronic versus early-stage schizophrenia, respectively, were observed in distinct prefrontal areas, namely the right middle frontal gyrus and the left superior frontal gyrus, respectively. Second, the cross-validation of the pharmacological and clinical analysis failed to reach significance; i.e., acute ketamine did not significantly change connectivity in the regions identified in the clinical study. Although it has limitations, this study should inform the application of acute ketamine as a translational model that may better approximate some early stage of schizophrenia.

References:

Dawson N, McDonald M, Higham DJ, Morris BJ, Pratt JA (2014a) Subanesthetic Ketamine Treatment Promotes Abnormal Interactions between Neural Subsystems and Alters the Properties of Functional Brain Networks. Neuropsychopharmacology 39:1786-98. Abstract

Dawson N, Xiao X, McDonald M, Higham DJ, Morris BJ, Pratt JA (2014b) Sustained NMDA receptor hypofunction induces compromised neural systems integration and schizophrenia-like alterations in functional brain networks. Cereb Cortex 24: 452-464. Abstract

Driesen NR, McCarthy G, Bhagwagar Z, Bloch M, Calhoun V, D'Souza DC et al (2013) Relationship of resting brain hyperconnectivity and schizophrenia-like symptoms produced by the NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine. Mol Psychiatry 18:1199-1204. Abstract

Jentsch JD, Roth RH (1999) The neuropsychopharmacology of phencyclidine: from NMDA receptor hypofunction to the dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 20: 201-225. Abstract

View all comments by Alexandre Seillier

Related News: Ketamine Elicits Brain State Resembling Early Stages of Schizophrenia

Comment by:  Albert Adell
Submitted 10 September 2014
Posted 16 September 2014

The paper by Anticevic and co-workers, as well as the commentary by Hugo Geerts, points to a very interesting issue on the similitude of the ketamine model with schizophrenia. In a previous mini-review, we anticipated that it would be conceivable that acute administration of NMDA receptor antagonists would lead to a reversible malfunctioning of PV-containing interneurons, whereas in schizophrenia, a damage of these neurons may take place at early stages of neurodevelopment (Adell et al., 2012). In summary, acute NMDA antagonism would resemble the early stage of schizophrenia, whereas chronic exposure better models the more chronic pathology of the illness.

References:

Adell A, Jiminez-Sanchez L, Lopez-Gil X, Roman T. Is the Acute NMDA Receptor Hypofunction a Valid Model of Schizophrenia? Schizophr Bull 38(1): 9-14. Abstract

View all comments by Albert Adell