How Nature and Nurture Form an Anxious Temperament
23 August 2010. Brain activity that correlates with anxious temperament may arise through different paths, according to a study published August 12 in Nature. In the largest imaging study of non-human primates, Ned Kalin of the University of Wisconsin in Madison, Wisconsin, and colleagues found that activity in the amygdala and in the hippocampus, regions involved in emotional memory formation, predicted anxious behavior in monkeys. However, genes influenced the activity in the hippocampus more so than that in the amygdala.
This surprising difference not only validates the idea that anxious temperament stems from both genetic and environmental factors, but it suggests that these factors differentially regulate different brain regions—even highly related and interconnected ones like the amygdala and hippocampus. This is important to bear in mind when considering the neural underpinnings of psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia, which is also thought to arise from a combination of genetic and environmental influences, and for which anxious temperament is a risk factor.
"Oler and coworkers' paper could, therefore, not only change thinking about how genes act in the brain to affect our habitual reactions to stress and adversity, but also benefit patients with mental conditions such as depression, anxiety disorders, and psychosis," writes Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg in an accompanying article about the study (Meyer-Lindenberg, 2010).
First authors Jonathan Oler and Andrew Fox and colleagues studied 238 rhesus monkeys from a multigenerational single-family pedigree, comprising a mix of closely related, distantly related, and unrelated monkeys. To get a read on how anxious the monkeys were, each was exposed to a human intruder. This stimulus elicited anxious behaviors such as “freezing” and raised levels of the stress hormone cortisol, but to a different degree in different monkeys, with some more anxious than others.
Next, the researchers searched for brain regions with activity that correlated with the anxious behavior, using 18F-labeled deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET). Because metabolically active neurons take up and trap FDG, this technique provides a snapshot of brain glucose use—an indicator of neural activity. Unlike fMRI, it doesn't measure brain activity in relation to a baseline. The authors used FDG-PET because they wanted to get a sense of personality-related brain activity—something that would stay more or less the same in different contexts, but that would vary according to temperament.
The technique revealed striking correlations between anxious behavior and FDG uptake in the amygdala and in the anterior hippocampus: the more anxious monkeys had higher FDG uptake in these regions, and the less anxious ones had less. The correlations were strong enough that this measure of brain activity was predictive of an animal's anxious behavior. The most predictive regions included the central nucleus of the amygdala (r = 0.44, p = 2.38 x 10-13) and the left hippocampus (r = 0.45, p = 8.3 x 10-13).
Then the researchers asked what amount of the anxiety-related activity in these areas was genetic. To do this, they made use of their vast pedigree to calculate the heritability of brain activity—that is, the amount of variance in brain activity across monkeys that could be explained by genetic variation. This analysis found that the anterior hippocampus and the amygdala differed in heritability values: in the anterior hippocampus, up to 76 percent of the variation in activity there was attributable to genes—meaning related monkeys had more similar brain activity values than unrelated ones—whereas for amygdala, no significantly heritable regions were detected.
A web of possibilities—traits and states
That genetic influences hold more sway over the anterior hippocampus than over the amygdala is a surprise, because activity in both regions were similarly predictive of anxious temperament, and because anxious temperament itself is significantly heritable. This suggests that the amygdala is more prone to environmental influences than to genetic ones, and it may be the substrate upon which life experiences contribute to the development of an anxious temperament.
But the findings do not rule out a role for genes in tilting the amygdala toward maladaptive anxiety. In fact, previous studies have found single gene effects on amygdala responses to fearful stimuli (e.g., Hariri et al., 2002). Looking at other aspects of amygdala function—its shape, size, or functional connectivity with other regions—may well reveal other heritable components. This illustrates how test- and technique-dependent measures of brain activity are, which may well lead to a range of heritability values. It will be important to distinguish between studies designed to measure chronic, personality-related brain activity like this one, and others that aim to measure the brain's acute reaction to certain stimuli.
Another possibility is that abnormalities in the amygdala reflect consequences (“state”) of anxious temperament, rather than something that lies on the causal pathway to this personality feature (“trait”). As the amygdala and other limbic structures have traditionally been of interest to schizophrenia researchers, it is interesting to note that a recent fMRI study of amygdala dysfunction in schizophrenia found just this: amygdala activity measured on fMRI reflected the dosage of drugs taken by schizophrenic individuals, rather than their genetic risk for the disorder (Rasetti et al., 2009). Figuring out whether a certain brain variation or abnormality is a trait or state requires inclusion of family members in imaging studies, and careful consideration of clinical records.
In this regard, the study's hippocampal findings may warrant an examination from schizophrenia researchers. Hippocampal volume is reduced in schizophrenia (see SRF Live Discussion), and given the region's sensitivity to stress hormones, this abnormality is often thought of as a consequence of living with the disease. The new study suggests that the anterior hippocampus is on the causal pathway—one most heavily influenced by genes—toward an anxious temperament, which may then predispose someone to schizophrenia.
With a clear genetic influence on the hippocampus, the researchers will next chase down the genes in question using genomewide association studies of hippocampal brain activity itself. Though this activity is far removed from genes, it is a good deal closer than behavior or diagnosis in emphasizing the value of finding useful intermediate phenotypes. As more researchers try to relate genetic variants to signals obtained from brain imaging, this study will provide a telling test case for research into psychiatric disorders.—Michele Solis.
Oler JA, Fox AS, Shelton SE, Rogers J, Dyer TD, Davidson RJ, Shelledy W, Oakes
TR, Blangero J, Kalin NH. Amygdalar and hippocampal substrates of anxious temperament differ in their heritability. Nature. 2010 Aug 12; 466: 864-868. Abstract
Meyer-Lindenberg A. Behavioural neuroscience: Genes and the anxious brain. Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):827-8. Abstract
Comments on News and Primary Papers
Comment by: Jenni Blackford
, Stephan Heckers (SRF Advisor)
Submitted 21 September 2010
Posted 21 September 2010
I recommend the Primary Papers
Studies of the biological bases of temperament can provide critical insights into why certain individuals are at increased risk for psychiatric disease. The study by Oler and colleagues makes an important contribution to the field by assessing the heritability of temperament-related brain activity in a large colony of pre-adolescent rhesus monkeys. The authors used a standard human intruder paradigm to elicit the phenotypic behavior and concomitant brain activity associated with anxious temperament. Temperament-related brain activity was first identified by correlating anxious temperament with glucose metabolism, the measure of brain activity. Next, heritability estimates were calculated for each voxel in these brain regions. Activity in both the amygdala and hippocampus were correlated with anxious temperament. The amygdala finding confirms previous studies of increased amygdalar activity in both monkeys and humans with an anxious temperament; however, amygdalar activity was not heritable. Instead, the temperament-associated activation in the anterior hippocampus was heritable, providing initial evidence for the hippocampus as a genetically determined neural substrate of anxious temperament.
This hippocampal finding is intriguing and provides a potentially important link among anxious temperament, social anxiety, and schizophrenia. Anxious temperament is a significant risk factor for social anxiety, and social anxiety is very common in individuals with schizophrenia, but a direct link between anxious temperament and schizophrenia has yet to be established. Structural and functional hippocampal deficits are well established in schizophrenia (Heckers et al., 1998; Wright et al., 2000), but most research on anxious temperament and social anxiety has focused on the amygdala, given its role in fight-or-flight fear responses. However, a model of personality proposed by Gray (1982) specifically predicted the septohippocampal system as a neural substrate of the anxiety-related Behavioral Inhibition System—a “system that responds to novel stimuli or stimuli associated with punishment or non-reward by inhibiting ongoing behavior and increasing arousal and attention to the environment.” Kagan’s (1988) temperament trait of Behavioral Inhibition was defined as wary or avoidant responses to novel stimuli and is also associated with risk for social anxiety. Thus, individual differences in temperamental traits related to detection of and response to novelty may be associated with increased risk for social anxiety.
Novel stimuli activate both the hippocampus and amygdala (Blackford et al., 2010), and both regions are involved in emotional memory formation (Phelps, 2004). For individuals with temperament and personality traits associated with increased risk for social anxiety, novelty detection and facial memory may be especially important. Among healthy controls, repeated presentations of a novel face result in increased recognition memory for the face and an associated reduction in amygdala activation (Breiter et al., 1996). Individuals with an anxious temperament fail to show this reduction, but instead have a sustained amygdala response to even familiarized faces (Blackford et al., 2010). Interestingly, individuals with schizophrenia also demonstrate a sustained amygdala response across repeated presentations of faces (Holt et al., 2005). Sustained amygdala activation to even familiarized faces may reflect a deficit in the creation of facial memories, such that the amygdala continues to respond to the faces as though they are new. These empirical findings suggest that dysfunction in a hippocampal-dependent familiarity process may underlie a continuum of social dysfunction ranging from anxious temperament to social anxiety to schizophrenia. This deficit may result in the social anxiety characteristic of both anxious temperament and schizophrenia.
A logical next step is to identify the genes that underlie the temperament-associated hippocampal activation. While much of the discovery in psychiatric genetics has focused on specific disorders, a shift to examining the genes underlying a dimension of social dysfunction may be fruitful.
Blackford JU, Avery SN, Cowan RL, Shelton RC, Zald DH. Sustained amygdala response to both novel and newly familiar faces characterizes inhibited temperament. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci . 2010 Jul 26. Abstract
Blackford JU, Buckholtz JW, Avery SN, Zald DH. A unique role for the human amygdala in novelty detection. Neuroimage . 2010 Apr 15 ; 50(3):1188-93. Abstract
Breiter HC, Etcoff NL, Whalen PJ, Kennedy WA, Rauch SL, Buckner RL, Strauss MM, Hyman SE, Rosen BR. Response and habituation of the human amygdala during visual processing of facial expression. Neuron . 1996 Nov 1 ; 17(5):875-87. Abstract
Gray JA. The neuropsychology of anxiety. Issues Ment Health Nurs . 1985 Jan 1 ; 7(1-4):201-28.
Heckers S, Rauch SL, Goff D, Savage CR, Schacter DL, Fischman AJ, Alpert NM. Impaired recruitment of the hippocampus during conscious recollection in schizophrenia. Nat Neurosci . 1998 Aug 1 ; 1(4):318-23. Abstract
Holt DJ, Weiss AP, Rauch SL, Wright CI, Zalesak M, Goff DC, Ditman T, Welsh RC, Heckers S. Sustained activation of the hippocampus in response to fearful faces in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry . 2005 May 1 ; 57(9):1011-9. Abstract
Kagan J, Reznick JS, Snidman N. Biological bases of childhood shyness. Science . 1988 Apr 8 ; 240(4849):167-71. Abstract
Phelps EA. Human emotion and memory: interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex. Curr Opin Neurobiol . 2004 Apr 1 ; 14(2):198-202. Abstract
Wright IC, Rabe-Hesketh S, Woodruff PW, David AS, Murray RM, Bullmore ET. Meta-analysis of regional brain volumes in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry . 2000 Jan 1 ; 157(1):16-25. Abstract
View all comments by Jenni Blackford
View all comments by Stephan Heckers
Comments on Related News
Related News: A Tale of Two City Exposures and the BrainComment by: John McGrath, SRF Advisor
Submitted 22 June 2011
Posted 22 June 2011
The findings from Lederbogen et al. are very thought provoking. The dissociation between the fMRI correlates of current versus early life urbanicity is unexpected. The authors have replicated their finding in an independent sample, reducing the chance that the finding was a type 1 error.
It is heartening to see important clues from epidemiology influencing fMRI research design. With respect to schizophrenia, the findings provide much-needed clues to the neurobiological correlates of urban birth (Pedersen and Mortensen, 2001; Pedersen and Mortensen, 2006; Pedersen and Mortensen, 2006). Somewhat to the embarrassment of the epidemiology research community, the link between urban birth and risk of schizophrenia has been an area of research where the strength of the empirical evidence has been much stronger than hypotheses proposed to explain the findings (McGrath and Scott, 2006; March et al., 2008). The new findings should trigger more focused research exploring the fMRI correlates in urban- versus rural-born individuals with schizophrenia.
March D, Hatch SL, Morgan C, Kirkbride JB, Bresnahan M, Fearon P, Susser E. Psychosis and place. Epidemiol Rev . 2008 Jan 1 ; 30():84-100. Abstract
McGrath J, Scott J. Urban birth and risk of schizophrenia: a worrying example of epidemiology where the data are stronger than the hypotheses. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc . 2006 Oct-Dec ; 15(4):243-6. Abstract
Pedersen CB, Mortensen PB. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between urbanicity during upbringing and schizophrenia risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry . 2001 Nov 1 ; 58(11):1039-46. Abstract
Pedersen CB, Mortensen PB. Are the cause(s) responsible for urban-rural differences in schizophrenia risk rooted in families or in individuals? Am J Epidemiol . 2006 Jun 1 ; 163(11):971-8. Abstract
Pedersen CB, Mortensen PB. Urbanization and traffic related exposures as risk factors for schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry . 2006 Jan 1 ; 6():2. Abstract
View all comments by John McGrath
Related News: A Tale of Two City Exposures and the Brain
Comment by: Elizabeth Cantor-Graae
Submitted 23 June 2011
Posted 23 June 2011
The study by Lederbogen et al. linking neural processes to epidemiology opens up an exciting avenue of inquiry, It suggests that exposure to urban upbringing could modify brain activity. Whether that could lead to schizophrenia per se remains to be seen.
Still, one might want to keep in mind that there is no evidence that urban-rural differences in schizophrenia risk are causally related to individual exposure. Pedersen and Mortensen (2006) showed that the association between urban upbringing and the development of schizophrenia is attributable both to familial-level factors as well as individual-level factors. Thus, the link between urbanicity and schizophrenia may be mediated by genetic factors, and if so, the social stressors shown by Lederbogen may in turn be related to those same genes.
Although it might be tempting to speculate whether Lederbogen’s findings have implications for migrant research, the “migrant effect” does not seem neatly explained by urban birth/upbringing. To the contrary, our findings show that the dose-response relationship between urbanization and schizophrenia (Pedersen and Mortensen, 2001) could be replicated only among persons born in Denmark whose parents had both been born in Denmark, and not in second-generation immigrants (Cantor-Graae and Pederson, 2007). Second-generation immigrants had an increased risk of developing schizophrenia independently of urban birth/upbringing (Cantor-Graae and Pedersen, 2007).
Pedersen CB, Mortensen PB. Are the cause(s) responsible for urban-rural differences in schizophrenia risk rooted in families or in individuals? Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 163:971-8. Abstract
Pedersen CB, Mortensen PB. Evidence of a dose-response relationship between urbanicity during upbringing and schizophrenia risk. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001; 58:1039-46. Abstract
Cantor-Graae E, Pedersen CB. Risk of schizophrenia in second-generation immigrants: a Danish population-based cohort study. Psychol Med. 2007; 37:485-94. Abstract
View all comments by Elizabeth Cantor-Graae
Related News: A Tale of Two City Exposures and the Brain
Comment by: James Kirkbride
Submitted 27 June 2011
Posted 27 June 2011
Mannheim, Germany, has long played a pivotal role in unearthing links between the environment and schizophrenia (Hafner et al., 1969). Using administrative incidence data from Mannheim in 1965, Hafner and colleagues were amongst the first groups to independently verify Faris and Dunham’s seminal work from Chicago in the 1920s, which showed that hospitalized admission rates of schizophrenia were higher in progressively more urban areas of the city (Faris and Dunham, 1939). Now, almost 50 years later, Mannheim’s historical pedigree in this area looks set to endure, following the publication of the landmark study by Lederbogen et al. in Nature, which reported for the first time associations of urban living and upbringing with increased brain activity amongst healthy volunteers in two brain regions involved in determining environmental threat and processing stress responses.
Tantalizingly, their work bridges epidemiology and neuroscience, and provides some of the first empirical data to directly implicate functional neural alterations in stress processing associated with living in urban environments. One important step will now be to discover whether such neural changes (following exposure to urban environments) are associated with clinical phenotypes, such as schizophrenia. This would support long-speculated paradigms of social stress (Selten and Cantor-Graae, 2005) as an important mechanism in a causal pathway between the environment and psychosis, although alternative environmental exposures in urban areas, including viral hypotheses and vitamin D, should not yet be excluded.
The work by Lederbogen et al. opens many avenues for possible study, including replication of their findings in clinical samples (via case-control designs) and using population-based rather than convenience samples. One of the greatest challenges in the social epidemiology of psychiatric disorders is to identify the specific suite of factors that underpin associations between the urban environment and the risk of clinical disorder. While Lederbogen et al. did not provide specific enlightenment on what these factors might be, their work also informs this search, because it suggests that focusing on factors likely to induce (or protect against) social stress would be potentially fruitful. To this end, their work should pave the way for mimetic studies, in both non-clinical and clinical populations, to investigate neural processing in relation to candidate social risk factors for psychiatric illness that were implicated in previous epidemiological studies (Cantor-Graae and Selten, 2005; March et al., 2008). These candidates may include migration or minority group membership (Coid et al., 2008), childhood traumas and other major life events (Kendler et al., 1992; Morgan et al., 2007), neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation (Croudace et al., 2000), income inequality (Boydell et al., 2004), and both individual-level social networks and neighborhood-level social cohesion and ethnic density (Kirkbride et al., 2008); some of these factors may also mitigate the effects of social stress.
The interface between social epidemiology and social neuroscience will also potentially provide new avenues by which to develop public health interventions. Presently, universal prevention strategies that focus on community-based interventions to prevent mental illness are not readily viable (Kirkbride et al., 2010), given both the absolute rarity of psychotic disorder and the relative ubiquity of broadly defined exposures such as urban living (many people live in urban environments, but only a handful of them will ever develop a psychotic illness). However, social neuroscience breakthroughs like those reported here may increase the viability of community-based public health initiatives by making it possible to move the focus of the intervention from preventing the clinical phenotype to preventing the abnormal neural changes associated with social-stress processing. Importantly, such strategies must also consider the possible benefits of enhanced social-stress processing in urban environments, which might be an important adaptation to more threatening environments. Because social stress may be associated with a range of neuropsychiatric and somatic disorders, public health strategies that target reductions in social stress rather than any single disorder may lead to significant improvements in population health across a range of morbidities. Such strategies, if justifiable, may also be cost effective, since a single intervention may prevent a range of disorders.
Hafner H, Reimann H, Immich H, Martini H. Inzidenz seelischer Erkrankungen in Mannheim 1965. Soc Psychiatr. 1969;4:127-35.
Faris REL, Dunham HW. Mental disorders in urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1939.
Selten JP, Cantor-Graae E. Social defeat: risk factor for schizophrenia? Br J Psychiatry. 2005 August 1;187(2):101-2. Abstract
Cantor-Graae E, Selten J-P. Schizophrenia and Migration: A Meta-Analysis and Review. Am J Psychiatry. 2005 January 1;162(1):12-24. Abstract
March D, Hatch SL, Morgan C, Kirkbride JB, Bresnahan M, Fearon P, Susser E. Psychosis and Place. Epidemiol Rev. 2008;30:84-100. Abstract
Coid JW, Kirkbride JB, Barker D, Cowden F, Stamps R, Yang M, Jones PB. Raised incidence rates of all psychoses among migrant groups: findings from the East London first episode psychosis study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(11):1250-8. Abstract
Kendler KS, Neale MC, Kessler RC, Heath AC, Eaves LJ. Childhood parental loss and adult psychopathology in women. A twin study perspective. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Feb;49(2):109-16. Abstract
Morgan C, Kirkbride JB, Leff J, Craig T, Hutchinson G, McKenzie K, Morgan K, Dazzan P, Doody GA, Jones P, Murray R, Fearon P. Parental separation, loss and psychosis in different ethnic groups: a case-control study. Psychol Med. 2007;37(4):495-503. Abstract
Croudace TJ, Kayne R, Jones PB, Harrison GL. Non-linear relationship between an index of social deprivation, psychiatric admission prevalence and the incidence of psychosis. Psychol Med. 2000 Jan;30(1):177-85. Abstract
Boydell J, van Os J, McKenzie K, Murray RM. The association of inequality with the incidence of schizophrenia--an ecological study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;39(8):597-9. Abstract
Kirkbride J, Boydell J, Ploubidis G, Morgan C, Dazzan P, McKenzie K, Murray RM, Jones PB. Testing the association between the incidence of schizophrenia and social capital in an urban area. Psychol Med. 2008;38(8):1083-94. Abstract
Kirkbride JB, Coid JW, Morgan C, Fearon P, Dazzan P, Yang M, Lloyd T, Harrison GL, Murray RM, Jones PB. Translating the epidemiology of psychosis into public mental health: evidence, challenges and future prospects. J Public Ment Health. 2010;9(2):4-14. Abstract
View all comments by James Kirkbride
Related News: A Tale of Two City Exposures and the Brain
Comment by: Wim Veling
Submitted 5 July 2011
Posted 5 July 2011
This publication is interesting and important, as it is one of the first efforts to connect epidemiological findings to neuroscience. Both fields of research have made great progress over the last decades, but results were limited because epidemiologists and neuroscientists rarely joined forces.
Several risk factors that implicate preconceptional, prenatal, or early childhood exposures have been consistently related to schizophrenia in epidemiological studies, including paternal age at conception, early prenatal famine, urban birth, childhood trauma, and migration (Van Os et al., 2010). While some of these associations are likely to be causal, the mechanisms by which they are linked to schizophrenia are still largely unknown. A next phase of studies is required, the methods and measures of which link social environment to psychosis, brain function, and genes. The study by Lederbogen and colleagues is a fine example of such an innovative research design. Their findings are consistent with hypotheses of social stress mediating the relationship between environmental factors and schizophrenia. It stimulates further research in this direction.
Two key issues need to be addressed. First, measures of social pathways should be refined (March et al., 2008). Which aspects of the daily social environment contribute to the onset of psychotic symptoms, how do these symptoms develop, and which individual characteristics moderate this outcome? It is extremely difficult to investigate daily social environments, because they are highly complex, cannot be controlled, are never exactly the same, and are strongly influenced by the individual’s behavior. Arguably, the only way to test mechanisms of psychotic responses to the social environment, and the moderators thereof, is to randomize individuals to controlled experimental social risk environments. Virtual reality (VR) technology, that is, substituting sense data from the natural world with sense data about an imaginary world that change in response to the user’s actions in an interactive three-dimensional virtual world, offers the possibility to do so. Freeman pioneered VR in psychosis research, investigating safety and feasibility (Fornells-Ambrojo et al., 2008; Freeman, 2008); however, there are no studies investigating mechanisms of risk environments. Our group recently found in a small pilot study that virtual environments with high population density or low ethnic density appear to elicit more physiological and subjective stress, as well as higher level of paranoia towards avatars (Brinkman et al., 2011). Larger studies and more experiments are needed.
Second, how are early social experiences translated to brain dysfunction? Another recent development has been in the field of epigenetics. Epigenetic mechanisms may mediate the effects of environmental risk factors, as the epigenetic status of the genome can be modified in response to the environment during embryonic growth, and probably also in the early years of life (Heijmans et al., 2009). Preliminary evidence suggests that epigenetic differences may be related to schizophrenia (Mill et al., 2008), but these epigenetic studies have not yet included environmental exposures. Epidemiologic studies may be a tool to detect epigenetic mechanisms in schizophrenia. Environmental exposures such as prenatal famine or migration may be used, as these exposures have been related to schizophrenia, can be measured with sufficient precision, offer homogeneously exposed populations for study, and had plausible biological pathways suggested for them (Veling et al. Environmental studies as a tool for detecting epigenetic mechanisms in schizophrenia. In: Petronis A, Mill J, editors. Epigenetics and Human Health: Brain, Behavior and Epigenetics. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011). Comparing the epigenome of exposed and unexposed schizophrenia cases and controls may help us to understand how gene expression affects disease risk.
As far fetched and futuristic as these research designs perhaps may seem, the publication of Lederbogen and colleagues shows that novel approaches can be very fruitful. If we improve interdisciplinary collaboration and use new technology, we may advance from associations to understanding in etiologic schizophrenia research.
Van Os J, Kenis G, Rutten BPF. The environment and schizophrenia. Nature. 2010;468:203-12. Abstract
March D, Hatch SL, Morgan C, Kirkbride JB, Bresnahan M, Fearon P, et al. Psychosis and place. Epidemiological Reviews. 2008;30:84-100. Abstract
Fornells-Ambrojo M, Barker C, Swapp D, Slater M, Antley A, Freeman D. Virtual Reality and persecutory delusions: safety and feasibility. Schizophrenia Research. 2008;104:228-36. Abstract
Freeman D. Studying and treating schizophrenia using Virtual Reality: a new paradigm. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2008;34:605-10. Abstract
Brinkman WP, Veling W, Dorrestijn E, Sandino G, Vakili V, Van der Gaag M. Virtual reality to study responses to social environmental stressors in individuals with and without psychosis. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. 2011;167:86-91. Abstract
Heijmans BT, Tobi EW, Lumey LH, Slagboom PE. The epigenome; archive of the prenatal environment. Epigenetics. 2009;4:526-31. Abstract
Mill J, Tang T, Kaminsky Z, Khare T, Yazdanpanah S, Bouchard L, et al. Epigenomic profiling reveals DNA-methylation changes associated with major psychosis. American Journal of Human Genetics. 2008;82:696-711. Abstract
Veling W, Lumey LH, Heijmans BT, Susser E. Environmental studies as a tool for detecting epigenetic mechanisms in schizophrenia. In: Petronis A, Mill J, editors. Epigenetics and Human Health: Brain, Behavior and Epigenetics. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.
View all comments by Wim Veling
Related News: A Tale of Two City Exposures and the Brain
Comment by: Dana March
Submitted 7 July 2011
Posted 7 July 2011
The paper by Lederbogen and colleagues represents a critical step in elucidating the mechanisms underlying the consistent association between urban upbringing and adult schizophrenia. As John McGrath rightly points out, the urbanicity findings have long been in search of hypotheses. We understand little about what the effects of place on psychosis might actually be (March et al., 2008). What it is about place that matters for neurodevelopment and for schizophrenia in particular can be greatly enriched by a translational approach linking epidemiological findings to clinical and experimental science (Weissman et al., 2011), which will in turn help us formulate and refine our hypotheses about why place matters. Lederbogen and colleagues have opened the door in Mannheim. Where we go from here will require creativity, persistence, and collaboration.
March D, Hatch SL, Morgan C, Kirkbride JB, Bresnahan M, Fearon P, Susser E. Psychosis and place. Epidemiol Rev . 2008 Jan 1 ; 30:84-100. Abstract
Weissman MM, Brown AS, Talati A. Translational epidemiology in psychiatry: linking population to clinical and basic sciences. Arch Gen Psychiatry . 2011 Jun 1 ; 68(6):600-8. Abstract
View all comments by Dana March