Schizophrenia Research Forum - A Catalyst for Creative Thinking
Home Profile Membership/Get Newsletter Log In Contact Us
 For Patients & Families
What's New
Recent Updates
SRF Papers
Current Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Conference News
Forums
Current Hypotheses
Idea Lab
Online Discussions
Virtual Conferences
Interviews
Resources
What We Know
SchizophreniaGene
Animal Models
Drugs in Trials
Research Tools
Grants
Jobs
Conferences
Journals
Community Calendar
General Information
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
History
SRF Team
Advisory Board
Support Us
How to Cite
Fan (E)Mail
The Schizophrenia Research Forum web site is sponsored by the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation and was created with funding from the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.
Research News
back to News Search
     
How Nature and Nurture Form an Anxious Temperament

23 August 2010. Brain activity that correlates with anxious temperament may arise through different paths, according to a study published August 12 in Nature. In the largest imaging study of non-human primates, Ned Kalin of the University of Wisconsin in Madison, Wisconsin, and colleagues found that activity in the amygdala and in the hippocampus, regions involved in emotional memory formation, predicted anxious behavior in monkeys. However, genes influenced the activity in the hippocampus more so than that in the amygdala.

This surprising difference not only validates the idea that anxious temperament stems from both genetic and environmental factors, but it suggests that these factors differentially regulate different brain regions—even highly related and interconnected ones like the amygdala and hippocampus. This is important to bear in mind when considering the neural underpinnings of psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia, which is also thought to arise from a combination of genetic and environmental influences, and for which anxious temperament is a risk factor.

"Oler and coworkers' paper could, therefore, not only change thinking about how genes act in the brain to affect our habitual reactions to stress and adversity, but also benefit patients with mental conditions such as depression, anxiety disorders, and psychosis," writes Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg in an accompanying article about the study (Meyer-Lindenberg, 2010).

Pedigree envy
First authors Jonathan Oler and Andrew Fox and colleagues studied 238 rhesus monkeys from a multigenerational single-family pedigree, comprising a mix of closely related, distantly related, and unrelated monkeys. To get a read on how anxious the monkeys were, each was exposed to a human intruder. This stimulus elicited anxious behaviors such as “freezing” and raised levels of the stress hormone cortisol, but to a different degree in different monkeys, with some more anxious than others.

Next, the researchers searched for brain regions with activity that correlated with the anxious behavior, using 18F-labeled deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET). Because metabolically active neurons take up and trap FDG, this technique provides a snapshot of brain glucose use—an indicator of neural activity. Unlike fMRI, it doesn't measure brain activity in relation to a baseline. The authors used FDG-PET because they wanted to get a sense of personality-related brain activity—something that would stay more or less the same in different contexts, but that would vary according to temperament.

The technique revealed striking correlations between anxious behavior and FDG uptake in the amygdala and in the anterior hippocampus: the more anxious monkeys had higher FDG uptake in these regions, and the less anxious ones had less. The correlations were strong enough that this measure of brain activity was predictive of an animal's anxious behavior. The most predictive regions included the central nucleus of the amygdala (r = 0.44, p = 2.38 x 10-13) and the left hippocampus (r = 0.45, p = 8.3 x 10-13).

Then the researchers asked what amount of the anxiety-related activity in these areas was genetic. To do this, they made use of their vast pedigree to calculate the heritability of brain activity—that is, the amount of variance in brain activity across monkeys that could be explained by genetic variation. This analysis found that the anterior hippocampus and the amygdala differed in heritability values: in the anterior hippocampus, up to 76 percent of the variation in activity there was attributable to genes—meaning related monkeys had more similar brain activity values than unrelated ones—whereas for amygdala, no significantly heritable regions were detected.

A web of possibilities—traits and states
That genetic influences hold more sway over the anterior hippocampus than over the amygdala is a surprise, because activity in both regions were similarly predictive of anxious temperament, and because anxious temperament itself is significantly heritable. This suggests that the amygdala is more prone to environmental influences than to genetic ones, and it may be the substrate upon which life experiences contribute to the development of an anxious temperament.

But the findings do not rule out a role for genes in tilting the amygdala toward maladaptive anxiety. In fact, previous studies have found single gene effects on amygdala responses to fearful stimuli (e.g., Hariri et al., 2002). Looking at other aspects of amygdala function—its shape, size, or functional connectivity with other regions—may well reveal other heritable components. This illustrates how test- and technique-dependent measures of brain activity are, which may well lead to a range of heritability values. It will be important to distinguish between studies designed to measure chronic, personality-related brain activity like this one, and others that aim to measure the brain's acute reaction to certain stimuli.

Another possibility is that abnormalities in the amygdala reflect consequences (“state”) of anxious temperament, rather than something that lies on the causal pathway to this personality feature (“trait”). As the amygdala and other limbic structures have traditionally been of interest to schizophrenia researchers, it is interesting to note that a recent fMRI study of amygdala dysfunction in schizophrenia found just this: amygdala activity measured on fMRI reflected the dosage of drugs taken by schizophrenic individuals, rather than their genetic risk for the disorder (Rasetti et al., 2009). Figuring out whether a certain brain variation or abnormality is a trait or state requires inclusion of family members in imaging studies, and careful consideration of clinical records.

In this regard, the study's hippocampal findings may warrant an examination from schizophrenia researchers. Hippocampal volume is reduced in schizophrenia (see SRF Live Discussion), and given the region's sensitivity to stress hormones, this abnormality is often thought of as a consequence of living with the disease. The new study suggests that the anterior hippocampus is on the causal pathway—one most heavily influenced by genes—toward an anxious temperament, which may then predispose someone to schizophrenia.

With a clear genetic influence on the hippocampus, the researchers will next chase down the genes in question using genomewide association studies of hippocampal brain activity itself. Though this activity is far removed from genes, it is a good deal closer than behavior or diagnosis in emphasizing the value of finding useful intermediate phenotypes. As more researchers try to relate genetic variants to signals obtained from brain imaging, this study will provide a telling test case for research into psychiatric disorders.—Michele Solis.

References:
Oler JA, Fox AS, Shelton SE, Rogers J, Dyer TD, Davidson RJ, Shelledy W, Oakes TR, Blangero J, Kalin NH. Amygdalar and hippocampal substrates of anxious temperament differ in their heritability. Nature. 2010 Aug 12; 466: 864-868. Abstract

Meyer-Lindenberg A. Behavioural neuroscience: Genes and the anxious brain. Nature. 2010 Aug 12;466(7308):827-8. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
Comment by:  Jenni BlackfordStephan Heckers (SRF Advisor)
Submitted 21 September 2010 Posted 21 September 2010
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Studies of the biological bases of temperament can provide critical insights into why certain individuals are at increased risk for psychiatric disease. The study by Oler and colleagues makes an important contribution to the field by assessing the heritability of temperament-related brain activity in a large colony of pre-adolescent rhesus monkeys. The authors used a standard human intruder paradigm to elicit the phenotypic behavior and concomitant brain activity associated with anxious temperament. Temperament-related brain activity was first identified by correlating anxious temperament with glucose metabolism, the measure of brain activity. Next, heritability estimates were calculated for each voxel in these brain regions. Activity in both the amygdala and hippocampus were correlated with anxious temperament. The amygdala finding confirms previous studies of increased amygdalar activity in both monkeys and humans with an anxious temperament; however, amygdalar activity was not heritable. Instead, the temperament-associated activation in the anterior hippocampus was...  Read more


View all comments by Jenni Blackford
View all comments by Stephan Heckers
Comments on Related News
Related News: A Tale of Two City Exposures and the Brain

Comment by:  John McGrath, SRF Advisor
Submitted 22 June 2011 Posted 22 June 2011

The findings from Lederbogen et al. are very thought provoking. The dissociation between the fMRI correlates of current versus early life urbanicity is unexpected. The authors have replicated their finding in an independent sample, reducing the chance that the finding was a type 1 error.

It is heartening to see important clues from epidemiology influencing fMRI research design. With respect to schizophrenia, the findings provide much-needed clues to the neurobiological correlates of urban birth (Pedersen and Mortensen, 2001; Pedersen and Mortensen, 2006; Pedersen and Mortensen, 2006). Somewhat to the embarrassment of the epidemiology research community, the link between urban birth and risk of schizophrenia has been an area of research where the strength of the empirical evidence has been much stronger than hypotheses proposed to explain the findings (McGrath and Scott, 2006;   Read more


View all comments by John McGrath

Related News: A Tale of Two City Exposures and the Brain

Comment by:  Elizabeth Cantor-Graae
Submitted 23 June 2011 Posted 23 June 2011

The study by Lederbogen et al. linking neural processes to epidemiology opens up an exciting avenue of inquiry, It suggests that exposure to urban upbringing could modify brain activity. Whether that could lead to schizophrenia per se remains to be seen.

Still, one might want to keep in mind that there is no evidence that urban-rural differences in schizophrenia risk are causally related to individual exposure. Pedersen and Mortensen (2006) showed that the association between urban upbringing and the development of schizophrenia is attributable both to familial-level factors as well as individual-level factors. Thus, the link between urbanicity and schizophrenia may be mediated by genetic factors, and if so, the social stressors shown by Lederbogen may in turn be related to those same genes.

Although it might be tempting to speculate whether Lederbogen’s findings have implications for migrant research, the “migrant effect” does not seem neatly explained by urban birth/upbringing. To the contrary, our findings show that the...  Read more


View all comments by Elizabeth Cantor-Graae

Related News: A Tale of Two City Exposures and the Brain

Comment by:  James Kirkbride
Submitted 27 June 2011 Posted 27 June 2011

Mannheim, Germany, has long played a pivotal role in unearthing links between the environment and schizophrenia (Hafner et al., 1969). Using administrative incidence data from Mannheim in 1965, Hafner and colleagues were amongst the first groups to independently verify Faris and Dunham’s seminal work from Chicago in the 1920s, which showed that hospitalized admission rates of schizophrenia were higher in progressively more urban areas of the city (Faris and Dunham, 1939). Now, almost 50 years later, Mannheim’s historical pedigree in this area looks set to endure, following the publication of the landmark study by Lederbogen et al. in Nature, which reported for the first time associations of urban living and upbringing with increased brain activity amongst healthy volunteers in two brain regions involved in determining environmental threat and processing stress responses.

Tantalizingly, their work bridges epidemiology and neuroscience, and provides some of the first empirical data to directly implicate functional neural alterations in stress processing associated with...  Read more


View all comments by James Kirkbride

Related News: A Tale of Two City Exposures and the Brain

Comment by:  Wim Veling
Submitted 5 July 2011 Posted 5 July 2011

This publication is interesting and important, as it is one of the first efforts to connect epidemiological findings to neuroscience. Both fields of research have made great progress over the last decades, but results were limited because epidemiologists and neuroscientists rarely joined forces.

Several risk factors that implicate preconceptional, prenatal, or early childhood exposures have been consistently related to schizophrenia in epidemiological studies, including paternal age at conception, early prenatal famine, urban birth, childhood trauma, and migration (Van Os et al., 2010). While some of these associations are likely to be causal, the mechanisms by which they are linked to schizophrenia are still largely unknown. A next phase of studies is required, the methods and measures of which link social environment to psychosis, brain function, and genes. The study by Lederbogen and colleagues is a fine example of such an innovative research design. Their findings are consistent with hypotheses of social stress mediating...  Read more


View all comments by Wim Veling

Related News: A Tale of Two City Exposures and the Brain

Comment by:  Dana March
Submitted 7 July 2011 Posted 7 July 2011

The paper by Lederbogen and colleagues represents a critical step in elucidating the mechanisms underlying the consistent association between urban upbringing and adult schizophrenia. As John McGrath rightly points out, the urbanicity findings have long been in search of hypotheses. We understand little about what the effects of place on psychosis might actually be (March et al., 2008). What it is about place that matters for neurodevelopment and for schizophrenia in particular can be greatly enriched by a translational approach linking epidemiological findings to clinical and experimental science (Weissman et al., 2011), which will in turn help us formulate and refine our hypotheses about why place matters. Lederbogen and colleagues have opened the door in Mannheim. Where we go from here will require creativity, persistence, and collaboration.

References:

March D, Hatch SL, Morgan C, Kirkbride JB, Bresnahan M, Fearon P, Susser E. Psychosis and place. Epidemiol Rev . 2008 Jan 1 ; 30:84-100. Abstract

Weissman MM, Brown AS, Talati A. Translational epidemiology in psychiatry: linking population to clinical and basic sciences. Arch Gen Psychiatry . 2011 Jun 1 ; 68(6):600-8. Abstract

View all comments by Dana March

Submit a Comment on this News Article
Make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Affiliation  
Country or Territory  
*Login Email Address  
*Confirm Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  
Get SRF newsletter with recent commentary?  
 
Enter the code as it is shown below:
This code helps prevent automated registrations.

I recommend the Primary Papers

Please note: A member needs to be both registered and logged in to submit a comment.

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


SRF News
SRF Comments
Text Size
Reset Text Size
Email this pageEmail this page

Share/Bookmark
Copyright © 2005- 2013 Schizophrenia Research Forum Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright