Schizophrenia Research Forum - A Catalyst for Creative Thinking
Home Profile Membership/Get Newsletter Log In Contact Us
 For Patients & Families
What's New
Recent Updates
SRF Papers
Current Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Conference News
Forums
Current Hypotheses
Idea Lab
Online Discussions
Virtual Conferences
Interviews
Resources
What We Know
SchizophreniaGene
Animal Models
Drugs in Trials
Research Tools
Grants
Jobs
Conferences
Journals
Community Calendar
General Information
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
History
SRF Team
Advisory Board
Support Us
How to Cite
Fan (E)Mail
The Schizophrenia Research Forum web site is sponsored by the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation and was created with funding from the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.
Research News
back to News Search
     
Meet Norbin—Behind the Scenes Player at mGluR5

20 December 2009. Researchers at Rockefeller University in New York report that they have identified a new booster of metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) function in the form of a protein called Norbin. As described in Science on December 11, Norbin (also known as neurochondrin) interacts with the intracellular part of the mGluR5 type of receptor beneath the cell membrane to increase its signaling power, suggesting a possible new avenue to treating schizophrenia by modulating signaling at NMDA glutamate receptors.

In a study that goes from molecules to mice, Marc Flajolet of Paul Greengard’s lab at Rockefeller led a multi-institution collaboration that characterized this protein in multiple ways, showing its influence on mGluR5 expression at the cell surface, mGluR5 signaling, synaptic plasticity, and behavior.

Researchers have been interested in promoting mGluR5 function because these receptors—through a chain of biochemical events—increase activity in NMDA receptors, which are hypothesized to be underactivated in schizophrenia (see SRF hypothesis reviews by D. Javitt and B. Moghaddam). Despite early evidence for the value of modulating NMDA function in schizophrenia (see SRF meeting report; SRF news story), the ultimate contribution of this approach remains in limbo, particularly as attempts at replication with the most promising compound—Lilly's mGluR2/3 agonist—have failed (see SRF meeting report). However, this may be due to methodologic issues, and work on NMDA receptors continues apace in academic and industry schizophrenia labs.

The new findings point to Norbin as a target that could be used to indirectly raise NMDA activity, without tinkering with the glutamate binding site for either NMDA or mGluR5 receptors.

Fishing for interactors
In looking for ways to promote mGluR5 function in the brain, first author Hong Wang of Rockefeller University and colleagues wanted to see if the brain already had something available. They used an intracellular portion of mGluR5 as bait to snag proteins liable to interact with it in the brain with a procedure known as a two-hybrid screen. They caught several proteins this way, including Norbin.

After verifying, using co-immunoprecipitation, that Norbin and mGluR5 actually interacted in the brain by catching them in the act, the researchers then found that Norbin binds mGluR5 at two intracellular sites close to the cell membrane. Mutations to these regions abolished binding with Norbin.

This coupling between the two proteins facilitated mGluR5 activity in cultured cells, as judged by the downstream products of mGluR5 activation with quisqualic acid: cells with both Norbin and mGluR5 produced 27.6 percent more inositol phosphates than those containing mGluR5 alone. Similarly, addition of Norbin to these cells led to longer-lasting calcium oscillations and more calcium peaks, both of which stem from release of calcium from intracellular stores after mGluR5 activation. The interaction between Norbin and mGluR5 was critical for this because these effects were not found in cells containing Norbin and mGluR5 that lacked the key binding site.

Norbin also boosted the amount of mGluR5 found on the surface of cultured cells, and, importantly, reducing endogenous Norbin expression in cultured neurons reduced mGluR5s at the cell surface.

Out of the petri dish
Leaving the petri dish and taking on the whole brain, the scientists showed that the pattern of Norbin expression in adult mouse brain resembled that of mGluR5, with prominent staining in the hippocampus, amygdala, septum, and nucleus accumbens. Synapses also contained both proteins, which colocalized to dendrites of hippocampal neurons.

Wang and colleagues also engineered conditional knockout (KO) mice to delete the Norbin gene postnatally in the forebrain; these mice also had lower levels of mGluR5 on the surface of neurons. Within the hippocampus, basic synaptic transmission was normal between Schaffer collaterals and CA1 neurons of these mice; however, synaptic plasticity was aberrant. In the Norbin KOs, mGluR5-dependent long-term depression was not as strong, reducing the synaptic signals to 85.4 percent of baseline, compared to the 69.9 percent found in wild-type mice. Similarly, a form of mGluR5-dependent long-term potentiation that increases synaptic signals could not be elicited from hippocampal slices taken from the Norbin KOs. These experiments suggest that the partnership with Norbin is key for mGluR5-mediated forms of synaptic plasticity.

Norbin KO mice also exhibited atypical schizophrenia-like behaviors. Though they startled to a loud noise just as much as wild-type mice, the Norbin KOs suppressed a subsequent startle response about 20 percent less in a prepulse inhibition paradigm. And in a test of the increased locomotion resulting from blocking NMDA receptors, the Norbin KOs were more sensitive, moving around about twice as much as wild-type mice. Blocking mGluR5s raised the amount of locomotion in response to the NMDA blocker in wild-type mice, but not in the Norbin KOs. This suggests that, without Norbin, mGluR5 receptors had bottomed out in their activity.

This report that Norbin, a protein that binds to mGluR5 beneath the cell surface, can substantially facilitate mGluR5 function suggests that the brain itself holds some good ideas for how to precisely modulate neurotransmission. It may be that modulating Norbin could be a strategy for treating schizophrenia, but at the very least, further research on the workings of the NMDA synapse and its many components promises to bring to light still more targets.—Michele Solis.

Reference:
Wang H, Westin L, Nong Y, Birnbaum S, Bendor J, Brismar H, Nestler E, Aperia A, Flajolet M, Greengard P. Norbin is an endogenous regulator of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 signaling. Science 326: 1554-1557. Abstract

 
Comments on Related News
Related News: ICOSR 2007—Glutamate Regulator May Be Alternative to D2 Blockers

Comment by:  Patricia Estani
Submitted 21 May 2007 Posted 21 May 2007

In the field of the psychopharmacology of schizophrenia, a lot of research work has been done on dopaminergic systems. Thus, this research news is excellent news because it explores an alternative neurotransmission system in schizophrenia, the glutamatergic system. Since the work of Dr. Bita Moghaddam in 1998, published in Science, a lot of research studies have turned to the important role of glutamate in schizophrenia. More studies are needed to focus on the exact role of this neurotransmitter.

View all comments by Patricia Estani


Related News: ICOSR 2007—Glutamate Regulator May Be Alternative to D2 Blockers

Comment by:  Joseph Neale
Submitted 14 July 2007 Posted 14 July 2007

The pioneering research over the past decade on group II metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) agonists from the Lilly Labs and Bita Moghaddam's research group has provided a strong foundation for the view that activation of these receptors reduces schizophrenia-like behaviors in the PCP and amphetamine models. These phase 2 clinical trials bring mGluR agonists one step closer to clinical use as therapy or co-therapy.

These same data provide the foundation for current and future research aimed at increasing the concentration of the peptide transmitter, N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) in the synaptic cleft by systemic administration of NAAG peptidase inhibitors. NAAG is the third most prevalent transmitter in the mammalian nervous system and a selective group II mGluR agonist with preference for mGluR3 (Neale et al., 2005). Our research group demonstrated that a NAAG peptidase inhibitor substantially reduces positive and negative behaviors induced in PCP models of schizophrenia (Olszewski et al., 2007;   Read more


View all comments by Joseph Neale

Related News: Studies Explore Glutamate Receptors as Target for Schizophrenia Monotherapy

Comment by:  Dan Javitt, SRF Advisor
Submitted 3 September 2007 Posted 3 September 2007

A toast to success, or new wine in an old skin?
Patil et al. present a landmark study. It is the kind of study that represents the best of how science should work. It pulls together the numerous strands of schizophrenia research from the last 50 years, from the development of PCP psychosis as a model for schizophrenia in the late 1950s, through the links to glutamate, the discovery of metabotropic receptors, and the seminal discovery in 1998 by Moghaddam and Adams that metabotropic glutamate 2/3 receptor (mGluR2/3) agonists reverse the neurochemical and behavioral effects of PCP in rodents (Moghaddam and Adams, 1998. The story would not be possible without the elegant medicinal chemistry of Eli Lilly, which provided the compounds needed to test the theories; the research support of NIMH and NIDA, who have been consistent supporters of the “PCP theory”; or the hard work of academic investigators, who provided the theories and the platforms for testing. The study is large and the effects robust. Assuming they replicate...  Read more


View all comments by Dan Javitt

Related News: Studies Explore Glutamate Receptors as Target for Schizophrenia Monotherapy

Comment by:  Gulraj Grewal
Submitted 4 September 2007 Posted 4 September 2007
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Related News: Studies Explore Glutamate Receptors as Target for Schizophrenia Monotherapy

Comment by:  Shoreh Ershadi
Submitted 8 June 2008 Posted 9 June 2008
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Related News: ICOSR 2009—Unpleasing Placebos Cloud Antipsychotic Drug Trials

Comment by:  Paul Shepard
Submitted 23 April 2009 Posted 26 April 2009

When the 17 sites with high placebo responders were removed from the analysis, were only participants randomized to placebo removed or were all subjects who were recruited at these sites removed?

View all comments by Paul Shepard


Related News: ICOSR 2009—Unpleasing Placebos Cloud Antipsychotic Drug Trials

Comment by:  C. Anthony Altar
Submitted 28 April 2009 Posted 2 May 2009

Reply to P. Shepard
At ICOSR, Dr. Kinon presented the effects on PANSS positive values over 4 weeks for the placebo group, the groups receiving various LY2140023 doses, and those receiving olanzepine, but "without the 17 sites." I am reasonably sure, but not 100% positive, that this excluded all data from those sites, not just the placebo responders. Anything less would have introduced an unacceptable bias, even for a post-hoc analysis.

View all comments by C. Anthony Altar


Related News: ICOSR 2009—Unpleasing Placebos Cloud Antipsychotic Drug Trials

Comment by:  Ralph Hoffman
Submitted 19 May 2009 Posted 20 May 2009

These placebo results are certainly irksome, but may be important in positive ways. I am thinking of two hypotheses to account for these results. First, perhaps second-generation antipsychotic drugs (that are now more widely in use than ever) have more sustained therapeutic effects after discontinuation, so when patients are taken off their prescribed drugs to participate in these trials, their vulnerability to symptomatic worsening is less.

Of course, this would not explain the greater improvements in placebo groups. But perhaps with growing expectations regarding patient safety and support during randomized clinical trials overall, participants are getting more contact with research staff, which may have non-specific positive effects. We have, for instance, solid data indicating that significant social isolation is a trigger for psychotic symptoms independent of neuropsychological impairment in vulnerable individuals (unpublished data). The combination of reduced social isolation, increased staff support, plus (perhaps) sustained protective effects of...  Read more


View all comments by Ralph Hoffman
Submit a Comment on this News Article
Make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Affiliation  
Country or Territory  
*Login Email Address  
*Confirm Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  
Get SRF newsletter with recent commentary?  
 
Enter the code as it is shown below:
This code helps prevent automated registrations.

I recommend the Primary Papers

Please note: A member needs to be both registered and logged in to submit a comment.

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


SRF News
SRF Comments
Text Size
Reset Text Size
Email this pageEmail this page

Share/Bookmark
Copyright © 2005- 2013 Schizophrenia Research Forum Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright