Schizophrenia Research Forum - A Catalyst for Creative Thinking
Home Profile Membership/Get Newsletter Log In Contact Us
 For Patients & Families
What's New
Recent Updates
SRF Papers
Current Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Conference News
Forums
Current Hypotheses
Idea Lab
Online Discussions
Virtual Conferences
Interviews
Resources
What We Know
SchizophreniaGene
Animal Models
Drugs in Trials
Research Tools
Grants
Jobs
Conferences
Journals
Community Calendar
General Information
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
History
SRF Team
Advisory Board
Support Us
How to Cite
Fan (E)Mail
The Schizophrenia Research Forum web site is sponsored by the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation and was created with funding from the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.
Research News
back to News Search
     
Cannabinoids and Schizophrenia: A Compensation Issue?

13 August 2008. Epidemiological studies suggest cannabis use is both a risk factor for developing schizophrenia and is associated with worse symptoms and cognitive impairment in people with the disease, but the exact nature of the link between cannabis use and schizophrenia is not known (see SRF related news story). A new paper from Stephen Eggan, Takanori Hashimoto, and David Lewis at the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania presents evidence for a biochemical link, showing that people with schizophrenia have lower levels of a major receptor for cannabinoids. The data, published in the July issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry, suggests that downregulation of the cannabinoid pathway could be a compensatory response to changes in GABAergic neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia. These same GABAergic aberrations may underlie the cognitive deficits seen in schizophrenia. Thus, the results could help shed light on the links between cannabis use and schizophrenia, and at the same time offer new targets for drug development aimed specifically at the cognitive aspects of the disease.

Though a cause-and-effect relationship has not been established between cannabis use and schizophrenia, it is known that long-term cannabis use in otherwise healthy people can affect working memory in a way that resembles the deficits seen in schizophrenia. In schizophrenia, Lewis and colleagues have suggested that these defects may be associated with reductions in GABA neurotransmission in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (for recent review, see Lewis and Gonzalez-Burgos, 2008). In that region, the cannabinoid receptor CB1R is found in a subpopulation of GABAergic, cholecystokinin-positive interneurons (distinct from the more well-known parvalbumin-containing GABA cells that Lewis's group also studies; see interview with Lewis), and functions to suppress GABA release. From this, Lewis and colleagues hypothesized that the CB1R in the prefrontal cortex might be altered in schizophrenia.

To test that idea, the investigators used in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry to look at CB1R mRNA and protein levels in postmortem brain tissue from 23 people with schizophrenia and 23 age-matched controls. They found that in the tissue from people with schizophrenia, both CB1R mRNA and protein showed a normal laminar distribution, but amounts were reduced. CB1R mRNA was down by 15 percent; protein was reduced by 12 percent, and both reductions were statistically significant. The CB1R protein was mainly detected in axons and synaptic terminals, and in subjects with schizophrenia, the density of CB1R-containing axons was reduced.

The reduction in CB1R correlated with reduction in markers of GABAergic neurotransmission in the same region. The subjects showed a significant within-pair correlation between differences in CB1R and the mRNA for GABA-synthesizing enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-67), and cholecystokinin, a neuropeptide that among its other actions appears to regulate the synthesis of endogenous cannabinoids. Because CB1R stimulation inhibits GABA release from CB1R and CCK-containing neurons, the authors suggest that the downregulation of CB1R could be a compensatory response to impaired GABA neurotransmission in the region.

Could the changes in CB1R stem from the use of antipsychotic medications, or even cannabis? Apparently not, the data suggest, as the results did not differ when adjusted for sex, diagnosis, or use of various medications. To directly test that idea that medications might affect CB1R levels, the investigators treated macaque monkeys for 17-27 months with haloperidol or olanzapine or placebo, and then looked at CB1R in the animals’ brain tissue. The distribution of CB1R in brain matched the human pattern, and the investigators found no effect of the medications on receptor mRNA levels.

The reduction of CB1R receptors did not seem to occur in response to cannabis use or dependence in the patients. In fact, the data show that mean CB1R mRNA and protein levels were higher in the subset of subjects with schizophrenia who also had a substance use disorder or a history of cannabis use, though not significantly so. This suggests that “these factors might have blunted the decreases in CB1R mRNA and protein levels in schizophrenia,” the authors write.

The results raise the possibility that decreased CB1R in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex there could reflect the brain’s attempt to normalize cognitive function in the face of a GABA deficit. “This interpretation implies that cannabis use in vulnerable individuals would counteract these compensatory responses, providing a potential mechanism linking cannabis exposure with an increased risk for the cognitive impairments of schizophrenia,” the authors write. In addition to providing a testable hypothesis, they write, the findings suggest novel targets for treating cognitive impairment, including CB1R antagonists.—Pat McCaffrey.

Reference:
Eggan SM, Hashimoto T, Lewis DA. Reduced cortical cannabinoid 1 receptor messenger RNA and protein expression in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;65(7):772-84. Abstract

 
Comments on Related News
Related News: Meta-analysis Supports Case for Cannabis in Etiology of Psychosis

Comment by:  Jim van Os
Submitted 8 August 2007 Posted 8 August 2007

This excellent review confirms the previous meta-analysis by Henquet et al. (2005) and as such does not add anything new. The importance lies in the UK context: previously the Lancet has been mostly skeptical with regard to this issue. The fact that the leading UK medical journal now also allows these findings to see daylight is a significant event and helps stimulate further funding for the effort that several groups worldwide have started working on over the last five years: the search for the mechanism explaining the link.

View all comments by Jim van Os


Related News: Meta-analysis Supports Case for Cannabis in Etiology of Psychosis

Comment by:  John McGrath, SRF Advisor
Submitted 9 August 2007 Posted 10 August 2007
  I recommend the Primary Papers

It is reassuring to see that the results of the latest meta-analysis (Moore et al., 2007) are consistent with previous meta-analyses, and that the various meta-analyses are broadly consistent with the now much-tortured primary data. Despite the meta-analysis fatigue, the results are too important to ignore.

When thinking about the impact of cannabis on schizophrenia frequency measures, it is important to remember that cannabis use may translate to an increase in the prevalence of active psychosis via two mechanisms. The data suggest that as the prevalence of cannabis use increases in a population, the incidence of schizophrenia should also increase (Hickman et al., 2007). Furthermore, in those with established schizophrenia, cannabis use is associated with poorer outcomes (i.e., reduced remission rates). Thus, from a modeling perspective, increased cannabis use could lead to an increase in the prevalence of active psychosis via two mechanisms (i.e., increased “inflow” and...  Read more


View all comments by John McGrath

Related News: Meta-analysis Supports Case for Cannabis in Etiology of Psychosis

Comment by:  Dana MarchEzra Susser (SRF Advisor)
Submitted 20 August 2007 Posted 20 August 2007

The recent meta-analysis in the Lancet (Moore et al., 2007) regarding cannabis use and psychotic or affective mental health outcomes is, indeed, a necessary contribution. It is the first systematic review restricted to longitudinal studies of cannabis use and mental health outcomes. For this addition to the contours of the literature, Zammit and colleagues are to be commended.

We may be more optimistic than the authors, however, about the potential for future longitudinal studies to shed further light on the question of causality, and perhaps more cautious about the present state of the evidence. Given the public health and policy implications, we propose a concerted effort to complete observational studies that are designed to rule out the main alternative explanations for the association (e.g., genetic or social factors that independently influence both cannabis use and psychosis). The Swedish conscript study (Zammit et al., 2002) is a fine example of one such study. We should...  Read more


View all comments by Dana March
View all comments by Ezra Susser

Related News: Meta-analysis Supports Case for Cannabis in Etiology of Psychosis

Comment by:  Amresh Shrivastava
Submitted 20 October 2007 Posted 24 October 2007

Current interest in cannabis and the onset of psychosis is laudable. The Lancet paper no doubt establishes a causal link based upon what has been known in the literature (Raphael et al., 2005; Roberts et al., 2007; Rey et al., 2004; Wittchen et al., 2007). The authors need to be congratulated for taking extreme care to incorporate most of the studies and also for making conclusions with a sense of skepticism. That is where further questions arise.

1. Cannabis is used only in certain cultures and known to be involved in a maximum 50 percent of cases of psychosis, schizophrenia, and schizophreniform psychosis (Gregg et al., 2007). In that sense, are there two different phenotypes of schizophrenia, a) where exposure to cannabis is necessarily a factor and b) where a different set of potentiating or precipitating factors work, not cannabis?

2. Even if we focus only on the first...  Read more


View all comments by Amresh Shrivastava
Submit a Comment on this News Article
Make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Affiliation  
Country or Territory  
*Login Email Address  
*Confirm Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  
Get SRF newsletter with recent commentary?  
 
Enter the code as it is shown below:
This code helps prevent automated registrations.

I recommend the Primary Papers

Please note: A member needs to be both registered and logged in to submit a comment.

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


SRF News
SRF Comments
Text Size
Reset Text Size
Email this pageEmail this page

Share/Bookmark
Copyright © 2005- 2013 Schizophrenia Research Forum Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright