Schizophrenia Research Forum - A Catalyst for Creative Thinking
Home Profile Membership/Get Newsletter Log In Contact Us
 For Patients & Families
What's New
Recent Updates
SRF Papers
Current Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Conference News
Plain English
Forums
Current Hypotheses
Idea Lab
Online Discussions
Virtual Conferences
Interviews
Resources
What We Know
SchizophreniaGene
Animal Models
Drugs in Trials
Research Tools
Grants
Jobs
Conferences
Journals
Community Calendar
General Information
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
History
SRF Team
Advisory Board
Support Us
How to Cite
Fan (E)Mail
The Schizophrenia Research Forum web site is sponsored by the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation and was created with funding from the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.
Research News
back to News Search
Biology of Reinforcement—Dopamine Linked to Three Separate Reward Paths

16 October 2007. Pavlov may not have known it, but his bell got more than saliva flowing. His experiments undoubtedly spurred dopamine release in his dogs’ brains, and probably in his own as well. We now know that the neurotransmitter mediates positive reinforcement associated with reward. More controversial is whether dopamine plays any role in negative reinforcement, as in learning to avoid displeasurable, or non-rewarding stimuli. A paper in the October 8 PNAS suggests that it does.

Researchers led by Michael Frank at the University of Arizona, Tucson, have correlated genetic polymorphisms with reward learning in young, healthy adults. Their findings indicate that dopamine plays a role in three independent reward pathways—short-term adaptability, and positive and negative long-term reinforcement. The findings are of interest to schizophrenia researchers given that compromised decision-making is one of the most debilitating facets of the disease.

Frank and colleagues studied the DARPP-32, DRD2, and COMT genes, all three linked to dopamine function: DRD2 is the gene for the D2 dopamine receptor; DARPP-32 codes for dopamine and cAMP regulated phosphoprotein of 32 kDa, which mediates the effects of dopamine D1 activation on synaptic plasticity; and COMT codes for catechol-O-methyl transferase, an enzyme that degrades dopamine. All three are candidate risk genes for schizophrenia (see SRF related news story and SRF news story).

The authors focused on an A/G DARPP-32 polymorphism that modulates striatal function (see SRF related news story). They predicted that this polymorphism might affect reward-based learning, since the DARPP-32 is highly abundant in the striatum, where D1 activation has been linked to decision-making based on positive outcomes. They focused on a C957T polymorphism in the DRD2 gene that affects post-synaptic D2 density, predicting that it might influence decisions associated with negative outcomes. And they looked at the Val158Met polymorphism in the COMT gene, which is associated with changes in dopamine level in the prefrontal cortex (see SRF related news story). The authors write that “this genetic marker of prefrontal DA function would predict the extent to which participants maintain negative outcomes in working memory to quickly adjust their behavior on a trial-to-trial basis.” The prefrontal cortex is an area of particular interest to schizophrenia researchers.

The authors correlated the three polymorphisms with reinforcement learning. Frank had healthy, young undergraduate students take part in a computerized test that simultaneously measures how well positive and negative feedback is learned. Briefly, the volunteers learn that on a probabilistic basis one possibility, “A,” is best chosen, while another, “B,” is best avoided.

The results supported the predictions. Averaging over a number of trials, DARPP-32 AA homozygotes were better than G carriers in the “choose-A” positive reinforcement scenario. In contrast, compared to those carrying the C allele, DRD2 TT homozygotes were much better in the “avoid-B” scenario, suggesting that they learn better from negative feedback. The Val/Met COMT polymorphism had no effect on positive reinforcement learning or avoidance learning over the long term. However, it did affect behavior on a trial-to-trial basis. Volunteers homozygous for the Val allele (and also the lowest prefrontal cortex dopamine) were less likely to alter their response based on a prior negative outcome.

“One of the surprising findings was that we saw such a large effect with individual genes,” said Frank in an interview with SRF. He noted that the results do not suggest 100 percent predictability; in other words, you cannot look at any one person’s genotype and know exactly how he or she is learning, “but nevertheless, across the samples the effect sizes we found were relatively large,” said Frank.

The other surprise was the D2 dopamine receptor role in negative reward learning, which has been a highly debated topic. Frank explained that work in primates has shown there is a pause in dopaminergic firing when the animals fail to get an expected reward. This has led to the suggestion that a dip in dopamine release may be involved in negative feedback learning. “The reason that is controversial is because the pause in these dopamine cells that happens during negative feedback is relatively small and because the baseline firing rate is already pretty low, so when they pause the change in firing rate is not nearly as big as during reward,” he explained. “In our specific model we can account for that because this negative-feedback learning depends on the D2 receptor, which is really sensitive to dopamine levels: essentially it is more sensitive to these small changes than the D1 receptor, which requires greater activation,” he said. He also stressed that this latest finding does not rule out the involvement of other neurotransmitters in avoidance learning.

Do these findings have any significance for schizophrenia research? The disease is certainly linked to dopamine dysfunction (see SRF Current Hypothesis) and also to deficits in the prefrontal cortex. Frank has already done a study in schizophrenic patients, in collaboration with Jim Gold’s lab at the University of Maryland, Baltimore. They found that people with schizophrenia were indeed impaired in that same measure of rapid learning from negative feedback, but they were just fine on long-term integration of negative feedback over many trials (see Waltz et al., 2007). But though the dopamine hypothesis for schizophrenia is a long-standing one, “there are many other factors that need to be considered in schizophrenia,” said Frank. “However, I do think that studying schizophrenia from a motivational standpoint, looking at reward processing, can be very fruitful. If there is a fundamental dysfunction in reward learning circuitry, that can lead to compounding effects on all sorts of behaviors," he said.—Tom Fagan.

Reference:
Frank MJ, Moustafa AA, Haughey HM, Curran T, Hutchison K. Genetic triple dissociation reveals multiple roles for dopamine in reinforcement learning. PNAS. 2007 Oct 8;104:16311-16316. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
Comment by:  Patricia Estani
Submitted 16 November 2007 Posted 16 November 2007
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Primary Papers: Genetic triple dissociation reveals multiple roles for dopamine in reinforcement learning.

Comment by:  Phil Corlett
Submitted 29 November 2007 Posted 29 November 2007
  I recommend this paper

The earliest formulations of schizophrenia hypothesized that the formation of inappropriate associations between stimuli, thoughts, and percepts was a core disease process (Bleuler, 1911/1950; Schneider, 1930). Having developed an understanding of association formation both psychologically and physiologically in experimental animals, Pavlov attempted to apply what he had learned to psychiatric patients at the Balinskiy Psychiatric Hospital (Pavlov, 1928). This attempt is being realized through translational behavioral neuroscience studies of the role of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the midbrain, striatum, and prefrontal cortex in associative learning, implicating aberrant learning processes and their brain basis in the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system in the genesis of positive psychotic symptoms (Kapur , 2003) and in particular delusional beliefs (Corlett et al., 2006; Corlett et al., 2007;   Read more


View all comments by Phil Corlett
Submit a Comment on this News Article
Make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Affiliation  
Country or Territory  
*Login Email Address  
*Confirm Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  
Get SRF newsletter with recent commentary?  
 
Enter the code as it is shown below:
This code helps prevent automated registrations.

I recommend the Primary Papers

Please note: A member needs to be both registered and logged in to submit a comment.

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


SRF News
SRF Comments
Text Size
Reset Text Size
Email this pageEmail this page

Share/Bookmark
Copyright © 2005- 2014 Schizophrenia Research Forum Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright