Schizophrenia Research Forum - A Catalyst for Creative Thinking
Home Profile Membership/Get Newsletter Log In Contact Us
 For Patients & Families
What's New
Recent Updates
SRF Papers
Current Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Conference News
Plain English
Forums
Current Hypotheses
Idea Lab
Online Discussions
Virtual Conferences
Interviews
Resources
What We Know
SchizophreniaGene
Animal Models
Drugs in Trials
Research Tools
Grants
Jobs
Conferences
Journals
Community Calendar
General Information
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
History
SRF Team
Advisory Board
Support Us
How to Cite
Fan (E)Mail
The Schizophrenia Research Forum web site is sponsored by the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation and was created with funding from the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.
Research News
back to News Search
Neuronal Plasticity the Arbor Way—Watching Dendritic Remodeling in the Neocortex

9 January 2005. The word "plasticity" means different things to different people. One of the more common uses refers to the inherent ability of neuronal circuits to change and adapt to their environment, but there are numerous candidates for the molecular and morphological processes underlying this the remodeling of circuits. It could be a subtle molecular rearrangement that changes the flux through specific circuits, or it could be as dramatic as completely rewiring the axons and dendrites of the neuronal circuitry. Scientists think of these plasticities as functional versus structural, and while there is evidence that both can occur in the mammalian neocortex, the latter has only been consistently demonstrated after injury or some kind of external manipulation. But in the December 27 PLoS Biology, Elly Nedivi and colleagues at MIT reported that dendrites in the mouse neocortex spontaneously expand and contract, a finding that might change the way some scientists view neuronal plasticity.

First author Wei-Chung Allen Lee and colleagues detected the structural plasticity when they used the powerful resolution of the two-photon microscope to visualize individual neurons inside the brains of 4- to 6-week-old living mice. Focusing their objectives on layer 2/3 of the visual cortex, they were surprised to see that all was not static. Images taken from exactly the same place, but at different times, revealed that dendrites, those arborlike branches that receive input from other neurons, appeared and disappeared with regularity.

Lee and colleagues monitored six pyramidal cells (named because of their shape) and eight nonpyramidal cells for three to 10 weeks. They found that each of the nonpyramidal cells had at least one, and as many as seven dynamic dendrite tips. In one neuron, four of 28 dendrite tips examined changed length. One of these branches extended by 16 μM over a 4-week period, while another extended by about 10 μM. In another nonpyramidal neuron, a single dendrite extended out of the field of view of the microscope. From age 11 to 13 weeks, that dendrite grew more than 90 μM. Overall, the authors found that about 14 percent (35 out of 259) of monitored dendrites grew (3 percent), retracted (2 percent), or did both (9 percent). By contrast, none of the 124 monitored pyramidal dendrites were dynamic, however, leaving the authors to conclude that “while dendritic branches of pyramidal cells remain stable, nonpyramidal interneurons in these layers are dynamic, exhibiting a range of structural changes on a week-to-week basis.” The authors found that the interneurons in question were γ-aminobutyric acid-, or GABAergic inhibitory neurons.

While this data indicates that the dendritic arbor can undergo spontaneous remodeling, the overall changes are small—only 1 to 5 percent of the total length of the dendritic arbor. This may explain why previous studies on remodeling have been inconsistent (for a review, see Chklovskii et al., 2004), but more importantly, it also raises questions of functional significance. “The functional test is a very hard one to pass,” said Karel Svoboda at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York. He and other researchers, including Wen-Biao Gan at New York University School of Medicine, work to address this issue by looking at the dynamics of neuronal spines, which harbor the synapses that many neurons use to communicate with each other. Using this method, both groups have shown that spines turn over in pyramidal neurons of the cortex in response to stimuli. With electron microscopy, Svoboda’s lab also showed that these spines do have synapses (see SRF related news story). Both groups also reported early last year that, though there are both persistent and transient spines in the pyramidal neurons of adult mice, the spines become more stable as the animals age (see Holtmaat et al., 2005 and Zuo et al., 2005). Many nonpyramidal dendrites do not contain spines. Despite this, Lee and colleagues were able to monitor the spines on one neuron, finding them to be motile. However, it is not clear if any new spines formed, or if any existing spines disappeared during the growth and retraction of the dendrites.—Tom Fagan.

Reference:
Allen Lee W-C, Huang H, Feng G, Sanes JR, Brown EN, So PT, Nedivi E. Dynamic remodeling of dendritic arbors in GABAergic interneurons of adult visual cortex. PLoS Biology. February 2006;4:e29. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
Primary Papers: Dynamic Remodeling of Dendritic Arbors in GABAergic Interneurons of Adult Visual Cortex.

Comment by:  Patricia Estani
Submitted 9 February 2006 Posted 9 February 2006
  I recommend this paper
Submit a Comment on this News Article
Make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Affiliation  
Country or Territory  
*Login Email Address  
*Confirm Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  
Get SRF newsletter with recent commentary?  
 
Enter the code as it is shown below:
This code helps prevent automated registrations.

I recommend the Primary Papers

Please note: A member needs to be both registered and logged in to submit a comment.

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


SRF News
SRF Comments
Text Size
Reset Text Size
Email this pageEmail this page

Share/Bookmark
Copyright © 2005- 2014 Schizophrenia Research Forum Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright