Schizophrenia Research Forum - A Catalyst for Creative Thinking
Home Profile Membership/Get Newsletter Log In Contact Us
 For Patients & Families
What's New
Recent Updates
SRF Papers
Current Papers
Search All Papers
Search Comments
News
Research News
Conference News
Forums
Current Hypotheses
Idea Lab
Online Discussions
Virtual Conferences
Interviews
Resources
What We Know
SchizophreniaGene
Animal Models
Drugs in Trials
Research Tools
Grants
Jobs
Conferences
Journals
Community Calendar
General Information
Community
Member Directory
Researcher Profiles
Institutes and Labs
About the Site
Mission
History
SRF Team
Advisory Board
Support Us
How to Cite
Fan (E)Mail
The Schizophrenia Research Forum web site is sponsored by the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation and was created with funding from the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health.
Research News
back to News Search
     
Chromosome 22 Link to Schizophrenia Strengthened

4 November 2005. There is now overwhelming evidence that genetic inheritance plays a major role in susceptibility to schizophrenia. And though no schizophrenia genes have yet been confirmed, there are plenty of candidates. Multiple lines of evidence, for example, suggest that a region in the small arm of chromosome 22 (22q11.2) might confer susceptibility to the disease. Two recent Nature Neuroscience papers bolster that connection.

The link between schizophrenia and chromosome 22q11.2 is particularly interesting because that segment of DNA harbors genes for two enzymes that can influence neurotransmission—catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and proline dehydrogenase (PRODH). COMT, of course, is crucial for dopamine metabolism, so any genetic variance that alters the activity of this enzyme could tip the balance toward too much, or too little, of this neurotransmitter. The PRODH link is less obvious, but again, loss or reduction of PRODH activity could lead to an increase in the level of proline, and it was recently shown that this amino acid accumulates in glutamatergic synapses where it probably modulates glutamate transmission (see, for example, Renick et al., 1999). Now, together, the two papers add weight to the COMT/PRODH link.

Allan Reiss and colleagues at Stanford University, California, together with collaborators at Tel Aviv University, Israel; the University of Geneva, Switzerland; and the University of Washington, Seattle, report on a study of adolescents with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The disorder is often referred to as velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS), a term that encompasses some of the most common early childhood manifestations such as cleft palate, heart defects, characteristic facial appearance, minor learning problems, and speech and feeding problems. The constellation of some 30 different identifying features, not all of which appear in any given child, are traceable to the deletion of that region of chromosome 22. About one third of all babies born with these deletions will go on to later develop schizophrenia (see, for example, Murphy et al., 1999).

First author Doron Gothelf and colleagues considered whether polymorphisms, or variations, in the undeleted copy of COMT may help to explain why some with the 22q11.2 deletion will develop schizophrenia, while others do not. They followed patients known to have the deletion, correlating the emergence of the disease with a known single nucleotide polymorphism—one that results in a methionine amino acid instead of a valine at position 158 and that ablates about one third of the enzyme’s activity.

Gothelf and colleagues tested 24 patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. During childhood, none showed evidence of a psychotic disorder, but in early adulthood, seven did. The authors found that the COMT variant with low enzyme activity (COMTL) correlated with lower verbal IQ and language skills and lower prefrontal cortex volume in these seven adolescents. The results suggest that “extreme deficiency in COMT activity, as present in the COMTL subjects with 22q11.2DS, is an important neurodevelopmental risk factor for decline in PFC [prefrontal cortex] volume and cognition and for the emergence of psychotic symptoms during adolescence,” write the authors.

In the second paper, Maria Karayiorgou's group at Rockefeller University, New York, and Joseph Gogos's group at Columbia University, New York, collaborated to model the effect of altering the expression of PRODH. First author Marta Paterlini and colleagues found that in mice, loss of the enzyme leads to increases in neuronal proline and that this, in turn, increases the probability that glutamate will be released into synapses in the hippocampus. In addition, the authors discovered that synaptic plasticity, as defined by the ability of neurons to modulate their activity in response to the activity of other nearby neurons, is compromised. They found, for example, that both paired-pulse facilitation and long-term potentiation, two commonly used measures of plasticity, were inhibited. The authors also found that loss of PRODH and increases in proline were accompanied by behavioral changes—the mice were generally less active, exploring about 25 percent less than normal mice, and they reacted less frequently in conditioned responses to stimuli such as mild shock. The animals also had a poorer response to psychotomimetic drugs, such as MK801, which increase glutamate release (this could be because the PRODH-deficiency already causes more release of glutamate than normal), but when given amphetamine, locomotor activity increased almost twofold more than in normal animals. “This is reminiscent of the increased susceptibility to the disorganizing effects of D-amphetamine observed in individuals with schizophrenia,” note the authors.

Gothelf and colleagues, in their 22q11.2 deletion paper, emphasize that many other genes in the vicinity of COMT and PRODH should be evaluated, and Paterlini and colleagues do just this, using a transcriptional profiling method to evaluate what genes may be turned on or off by the loss of PRODH in their animal model. And one of the genes that interacts most strongly with PRODH was none other than COMT, which was upregulated in the prefrontal cortex of the PRODH-deficient animals. This not only buttresses the argument for COMT and PRODH as key risk factors for schizophrenia, but also suggests that the two genes may interact.—Tom Fagan.

References:
Paterlini M, Zakharenko SS, Lai W-S, Qin J, Zhang H, Mukai J, Westphal KGC, Olivier B, Sulzer D, Pavlidis P, Siegelbaum SA, Karayiorgou M, Gogos JA. Transcriptional and behavioral interaction between 22q11.2 orthologs modulates schizophrenia-related phenotypes in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1586-1594. Epub 2005 Oct 23. Abstract

Gothelf D, Eliez S, Thompson T, Hinard C, Penniman L, Einstein C, Kwon H, Jin S, Jo B, Antonarakis SE, Morris MA, Reiss AI. COMT genotype predicts longitudinal cognitive decline and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Nov;8(11):1500-2. Epub 2005 Oct 23. Abstract

 
Comments on News and Primary Papers
Comment by:  Anthony Grace, SRF Advisor (Disclosure)
Submitted 5 November 2005 Posted 5 November 2005

The fact that the PRODH alteration studied in Gogos et al. leads to alterations in glutamate release, and this corresponds to deficits in associative learning and response to psychotomimetics, provides a nice parallel to the human condition. The Reiss paper examines humans with the 22q11.2 deletion, and shows that the COMT low-activity allele of this deletion syndrome correlates with cognitive decline, PFC volume, and development of psychotic symptoms. This is a nice addition to the Weinberger and Bilder papers about how COMT can lead to psychosis vulnerability.

View all comments by Anthony Grace


Comment by:  Caterina Merendino
Submitted 5 November 2005 Posted 5 November 2005
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Primary Papers: COMT genotype predicts longitudinal cognitive decline and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Comment by:  Jeffrey Lieberman, SRF Advisor
Submitted 6 November 2005 Posted 6 November 2005
  I recommend this paper

Isn't the association of the low-activity COMT allele with development of psychotic symptoms in the paper by Gothelf et al. inconsistent with the finding of Egan et al. and subsequent replications? The latter's findings of decreased cortical information processing efficiency and vulnerability to schizophrenia was with the high-activity allele. How is this apparent inconsistency in the 22q11.2 deletion subjects reconciled?

View all comments by Jeffrey Lieberman


Comment by:  Leboyer Marion
Submitted 6 November 2005 Posted 6 November 2005
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Comment by:  Anne Bassett
Submitted 7 November 2005 Posted 7 November 2005
  I recommend the Primary Papers

I echo Jeff Lieberman's comment regarding previous reports of a weak association between the Val COMT functional allele and schizophrenia. Notably, the most recent meta-analysis (Munafo et al., 2005) shows no significant association. Even in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22qDS), our group (unpublished) and Murphy et al. (1999) have reported that there is no association between COMT genotype and schizophrenia, and Bearden et al. reported that Val-hemizygous patients performed significantly worse than Met-hemizygous patients on executive cognition ( 2004) and childhood behavioral problems (2005). Though important as an initial prospective study, there is a risk in the Gothelf et al. small sample size and multiple testing for type 1 errors. Certainly, there is little...  Read more


View all comments by Anne Bassett

Primary Papers: COMT genotype predicts longitudinal cognitive decline and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Comment by:  Daniel Weinberger, SRF Advisor
Submitted 14 November 2005 Posted 14 November 2005

Drs. Lieberman and Basset raise an important question about why the met allele in the VCFS early adult cases is associated with cognitive decline and risk for psychosis, while the val allele tends to be associated with both characteristics when there is a positive association to COMT in adult subjects. I believe that the data of Gothelf and colleagues are entirely consistent with predictions about what would be expected in VCFS based on evidence that dopamine signaling in prefrontal cortex relates to prefrontal function as an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve. Too little dopamine, as might be seen in normal aging, in Parkinson's disease and possibly in schizophrenia, is associated with relatively abnormal prefrontal function, and too much dopamine, as might be seen in amphetamine or other acute psychotic states, also is associated with relatively abnormal prefrontal function. Landmark experiments from the laboratory of the late Patricia Goldman-Rakic at Yale demonstrated this in the monkey, and   Read more


View all comments by Daniel Weinberger

Primary Papers: COMT genotype predicts longitudinal cognitive decline and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Comment by:  Doron GothelfAllan Reiss
Submitted 18 November 2005 Posted 18 November 2005

Reply to comments by Lieberman and Bassett

I have just seen Dr. Weinberger's reply and our reply follows the same vein.

22q11.2DS subjects are unique in that they are hemizygous for the COMT gene, that is, have half the dosage of the gene and are thus different from the general population and from non-22q11.2DS schizophrenia patients. The model we think best integrates our "met" findings with the "val" findings in non-22q11.2DS schizophrenia is that of the hypothetical inverted U-shape relationship between prefrontal dopamine levels and cognitive functioning/neuropsychiatric risk. Too much dopamine, as presumably occurs in the prefrontal cortex of the 22q11.2DS "met" subgroup, or too little prefrontal dopamine, as presumably occurs in the general schizophrenia population, puts subjects outside the “optimal” dopamine range and in a less favorable state in terms of cognitive functioning and risk for psychosis. As Dr. Bassett noted, there are indeed studies that found higher cognitive performance in 22q11.DS children with the "val" as compared to "met." In our...  Read more


View all comments by Doron Gothelf
View all comments by Allan Reiss

Primary Papers: COMT genotype predicts longitudinal cognitive decline and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Comment by:  Carrie Bearden
Submitted 21 November 2005 Posted 21 November 2005
  I recommend this paper

Gothelf and colleagues present a novel study (the first longitudinal investigation of psychopathology, cognition, and brain volume in adolescents with 22q11.2 deletions) with a very interesting result. As they correctly assert in their manuscript, their baseline finding of a trend toward better cognitive function in the COMT H (Val) subgroup is consistent with our previous finding of a tendency toward higher full-scale IQ in Val-hemizygous patients with 22q11.2 deletions versus Met-hemizygous patients (mean = 77.6 [SD = 10.5] versus 71.8 [SD = 11.4], respectively; F = 2.98, df = 1, 42, p = 0.09; Bearden et al., 2004). Despite this, as Dr. Bassett described above, we also found that Met-hemizygous patients performed significantly better than Val-hemizygous patients on measures of executive function (specifically Digit Span and Trailmaking B), after controlling for overall effects of IQ. In addition, we found that Val genotype was associated with a greater-than-fourfold increase in risk for clinically...  Read more


View all comments by Carrie Bearden

Primary Papers: COMT genotype predicts longitudinal cognitive decline and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Comment by:  Patricia Estani
Submitted 23 November 2005 Posted 23 November 2005
  I recommend this paper

I agree with the comments of Dr. Weinberger about the COMT gene and schizophrenia. This relationships is consistent with the data of Gothelf et al. More experiments must be carried out to separate these variables.

View all comments by Patricia Estani


Primary Papers: COMT genotype predicts longitudinal cognitive decline and psychosis in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.

Comment by:  William Carpenter, SRF Advisor (Disclosure)
Submitted 27 December 2005 Posted 27 December 2005
  I recommend this paper
Comments on Related News
Related News: New Genetic Variations Link Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

Comment by:  Mary Reid
Submitted 28 September 2006 Posted 29 September 2006

It's of interest that Vazza and colleagues suggest that 15q26 is a new susceptibility locus for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. I have suggested that reduced function of the anti-inflammatory SEPS1 (selenoprotein S) at 15q26.3 may reproduce the neuropathology seen in schizophrenia.

View all comments by Mary Reid


Related News: New Genetic Variations Link Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

Comment by:  Patricia Estani
Submitted 5 October 2006 Posted 6 October 2006
  I recommend the Primary Papers

Related News: 22q11 and Schizophrenia: New Role for microRNAs and More

Comment by:  Linda Brzustowicz
Submitted 21 May 2008 Posted 21 May 2008

While some have expressed frustration over the lack of clear reproducibility of linkage and association findings in schizophrenia, the importance of the chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome (22q11DS) as a real and significant genetic risk factor for schizophrenia has often been overlooked. While the deletion syndrome is present in a minority of individuals with schizophrenia (estimates of approximately 1 percent), presence of the deletion increases risk of developing schizophrenia some 30-fold, making this one of the clearest known genetic risk factors for a psychiatric illness. As multiple genes are deleted in 22q11DS, it can be a challenge to determine which gene or genes are involved in specific phenotypic elements of this syndrome.

The May 11, 2008, paper by Stark et al. highlights the utility of engineered animals for dissecting the individual effects of multiple genes within a deletion region and provides an important clue into the mechanism likely responsible for at least some of the behavioral aspects of the phenotype....  Read more


View all comments by Linda Brzustowicz

Related News: Are Membrane Molecules Unmoored in 22q11DS Mouse?

Comment by:  Doron Gothelf
Submitted 27 October 2008 Posted 27 October 2008

The common theory held until recently regarding the genetic underpinning of neuropsychiatric disorders was based on the “common disease-common variant” model. According to that theory, multiple common alleles in the population contribute small-to-moderate additive or multiplicative effects to the predisposition to neuropsychiatric disorders. With the advances in genetic screening technologies this theory is now being challenged. Recent findings indicate that rare copy number variations (CNVs) may account for a substantial fraction of the overall genetic risk for neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia and autism (Consortium, 2008; Stefansson et al., 2008; Mefford et al., 2008). The 22q11.2 microdeletion was the most common CNV identified in patients with schizophrenia in a recent large scale study of patients with schizophrenia (Consortium, 2008). The 22q11.2 microdeletion is also...  Read more


View all comments by Doron Gothelf

Related News: Copy-number Variants, Interacting Alleles, or Both?

Comment by:  David J. Porteous, SRF Advisor
Submitted 11 February 2009 Posted 12 February 2009

The answer is unequivocally, “yes”
In co-highlighting the papers from Need et al., 2009, and Tomppo et al., 2009, you pose the question “CNV’s, interacting loci or both?” to which my immediate answer is an unequivocal “yes,” but it actually goes further than that. These two studies, interesting in their own rights, add just two more pieces of evidence now accumulated from case only, case-control, and family-based linkage on the genetic architecture of schizophrenia. Thus, we can reject with confidence a single evolutionary and genetic origin for schizophrenia. If it were so, it would have been found already by the plethora of genomewide studies now completed, studies specifically designed to detect causal variants, should they exist, which are both common to most if not all subjects and ancient in origin—the Common Disease, Common Variant (CDCV) hypothesis.

Moreover, for DISC1, NRG1, NRXN1, and a few others, the criteria for causality are met in some subjects, but none of these is the sole cause of schizophrenia. Their net contributions to individual and...  Read more


View all comments by David J. Porteous

Related News: Copy-number Variants, Interacting Alleles, or Both?

Comment by:  Pamela DeRosseAnil Malhotra (SRF Advisor)
Submitted 19 February 2009 Posted 22 February 2009

The results reported by Tomppo et al. and Need et al. collectively instantiate the complexities of the genetic architecture underlying risk for psychiatric illness. Paradoxically, however, while the results of Need et al. suggest that the answer to the complex question of risk genes for schizophrenia (SZ) may be found by searching a very select population for rare changes in genetic sequence, the results of Tomppo et al. suggest that the answer may be found by searching for common variants in large heterogeneous populations. So which is it? Is SZ the result of rare, novel genetic mutations or an accumulation of common ones? Such a conundrum is not a novel predicament in the process of scientific inquiry and such conundrums are often resolved by the reconciliation of both opposing views. Thus, if we allow history to serve as our guide it seems reasonable that the answer to the current question of what genetic mechanisms are responsible for SZ, is that SZ is caused by both rare and common variants.

Although considerable efforts, by our lab and others, are currently being...  Read more


View all comments by Pamela DeRosse
View all comments by Anil Malhotra

Related News: Copy-number Variants, Interacting Alleles, or Both?

Comment by:  James L. Kennedy, SRF Advisor (Disclosure)
Submitted 25 February 2009 Posted 25 February 2009

Has anyone considered the possibility that the CNVs found to be elevated in schizophrenia versus controls could be a peripheral effect and perhaps not present in brain tissue? For example, the diet of the typical schizophrenia patient is poor, and it is conceivable that chronic folate deficiency could predispose to problems in DNA structure or repair in lymphocytes. Thus, the CNVs could be an effect of the illness, and not a cause. Someone needs to do the experiment that compares CNVs in blood to those in the brain of the same individual. And then we need studies of the stability of CNVs over the lifetime of an individual.

View all comments by James L. Kennedy


Related News: Copy-number Variants, Interacting Alleles, or Both?

Comment by:  Kevin J. Mitchell
Submitted 2 March 2009 Posted 2 March 2009

The papers by Need et al. and Tomppo et al. seem to present conflicting evidence for the involvement of common or rare variants in the etiology of schizophrenia.

On the one hand, Need et al., in a very large and well-powered sample, find no evidence for involvement of any common SNPs or CNVs. Importantly, they show that while any one SNP with a small effect and modest allelic frequency might be missed by their analysis, the likelihood that all such putative SNPs would be missed is vanishingly small. They come to the reasonable conclusion that common variants are unlikely to play a major role in the etiology of schizophrenia, except under a highly specific and implausible genetic model. Does this sound the death knell for the common variants, polygenic model of schizophrenia? Yes and no. These and other empirical data are consistent with theoretical analyses which show that the currently popular purely polygenic model, without some gene(s) of large effect, cannot explain familial risk patterns (Hemminki et al., 2007;   Read more


View all comments by Kevin J. Mitchell

Related News: Genomic Studies Draw Autism and Schizophrenia Back Toward Each Other

Comment by:  Katie Rodriguez
Submitted 7 November 2009 Posted 7 November 2009

If schizophrenia and autism are on a spectrum, how can there be people who are both autistic and schizophrenic? I know of a few people who suffer from both diseases.

View all comments by Katie Rodriguez


Related News: Genomic Studies Draw Autism and Schizophrenia Back Toward Each Other

Comment by:  Bernard Crespi
Submitted 12 November 2009 Posted 12 November 2009

One Hundred Years of Insanity: The Relationship Between Schizophrenia and Autism
The great Colombian author Gabriel García Márquez reified the cyclical nature of history in his Nobel Prize-winning 1967 book, One Hundred Years of Solitude. Eugen Bleuler’s less-famous book Dementia Præcox or the Group of Schizophrenias, originally published in 1911, saw first use of the term “autism,” a form of solitude manifest as withdrawal from reality in schizophrenia. This neologism, about to celebrate its centenary, epitomizes an astonishing cycle of reification and change in nosology, a cycle only now coming into clear view as molecular-genetic data confront the traditional, age-old categories of psychiatric classification.

The term autism was, of course, redefined by Leo Kanner (1943) for a childhood psychiatric condition first considered as a subset of schizophrenia, then regarded as quite distinct (Rutter, 1972) or even opposite to it (Rimland, 1964; Crespi and Badcock, 2008), and most recently seen by some researchers as returning to its original...  Read more


View all comments by Bernard Crespi

Related News: Genomic Studies Draw Autism and Schizophrenia Back Toward Each Other

Comment by:  Suzanna Russell-SmithDonna BaylissMurray Maybery
Submitted 9 February 2010 Posted 10 February 2010

The Diametric Opposition of Autism and Psychosis: Support From a Study of Cognition
As has been noted previously, Crespi and Badcock’s (2008) theory that autism and schizophrenia are diametrically opposed disorders is certainly a novel and somewhat controversial one. In his recent blog on Psychology Today, Badcock states that the theory stands on two completely different foundations: one in evolution and genetics, and one in psychiatry and cognitive science (Badcock, 2010). While most of the comments posted before ours have addressed the relationship between autism and schizophrenia from a genetic perspective, coming from a psychology background, we note that it is the aspects of Crespi and Badcock’s theory that relate to cognition which have particularly caught our attention. While we can therefore contribute little to the discussion of a relationship between autism and schizophrenia...  Read more


View all comments by Suzanna Russell-Smith
View all comments by Donna Bayliss
View all comments by Murray Maybery
Submit a Comment on this News Article
Make a comment on this news article. 

If you already are a member, please login.
Not sure if you are a member? Search our member database.

*First Name  
*Last Name  
Affiliation  
Country or Territory  
*Login Email Address  
*Confirm Email Address  
*Password  
*Confirm Password  
Remember my Login and Password?  
Get SRF newsletter with recent commentary?  
 
Enter the code as it is shown below:
This code helps prevent automated registrations.

I recommend the Primary Papers

Please note: A member needs to be both registered and logged in to submit a comment.

Comment:

(If coauthors exist for this comment, please enter their names and email addresses at the end of the comment.)

References:


SRF News
SRF Comments
Text Size
Reset Text Size
Email this pageEmail this page

Share/Bookmark
Copyright © 2005- 2013 Schizophrenia Research Forum Privacy Policy Disclaimer Disclosure Copyright